I would be interested in whether this response would extend to any proposal
by an employer in the guise of workplace safety to randomly drug test staff.
I am aware of a proposal in one large forestry company to introduce
"compulsory random" testing.
Regards
Alan
Alan Sutherland
Health Promotion Policy Officer
Strategic Analysis and Research
Strategic and Corporate Support Division
Department of Health and Human Services
PO Box 125B, Hobart
TASMANIA
AUSTRALIA 7000
Phone: (03) 6233 3147
FAX: (03) 6233 2899
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Contacting from another Country:
Your International Access Number for Australia
+ 61 + 3 + (eight digit call number above)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Serwonka [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, 1 December 2000 10:52
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: drug testing ~ Violation of UN Covenants??
>
> At the recent 4th Annual Western Canada Poor People's Conference in
> Winnipeg, I learnt that some social justice groups such as the National
> Anti-Poverty Organization have done some important work to expose the
> violations by various levels of government in Canada (federal, provincial,
> municipal) of international covenants (e.g. Human Right; Economic, Social
> and Cultural Rights) signed at the United Nations.
>
> Why am I mentioning this? The observations of these UN committees can, in
> turn, be used as powerful lobbying tools to hold our government(s) to task
> for international obligations they have made by virtue of signing these
> covenants.
>
> From a 1999 observation of the UN Human Rights Committee on
> fingerprinting,
> it would seem that drug testing similarly violates the privacy rights of
> social assistance recipients. The 1999 UN Human Rights Committee
> observation was as follows:
>
> "The Committee is concerned about the increasingly intrusive measures
> affecting the right to privacy, under article 17 of the Covenant
> (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), of people relying
> on
> social assistance, including identification techniques such as
> fingerprinting and retinal scanning. The Committee recommends that the
> State Party (the federal government) take steps to ensure the elimination
> of
> such practices."
> Source: Observation #16 in the Concluding observations of the Human Rights
> Committee: Canada. 07/04/99. CCPR/C/79/Add.105. (Concluding
> Observations/Comments)
>
> We may have some influence over anti-democratic policy if we create more
> opportunities to REMIND (or inform them in the first place) POLITICIANS at
> all levels of government of their obligations under these international
> covenants which Canada has signed. I suggest partnering with the National
> Anti-Poverty Organization (NAPO) in Ottawa on such efforts.
>
> As a signatory to these Covenants, the Federal Government must submit
> reports to the UN Committees named above, (usually every five years).
> NAPO
> was one of several NGOs, whose witness testimony and evidence presented to
> the commmittees, resulted in (a) UN recognition of areas where the
> government failed to live up to the obligations, (b)UN recommendations on
> how the goverment could meet their obligations under the convenants.
>
> The Covenants which Canada has signed, as well as the Concluding
> Observations from these UN Committees on Canada's progress in living up to
> the commitments of these covenants, are available on the web site of the
> United Nations High Commision for Human Rights at http://www.unhchr.ch/
>
> Good luck in your lobbying efforts.
>
> Karen Serwonka
>
> >From: "d.raphael" <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: Health Promotion on the Internet <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: drug testing
> >Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:45:57 PST
> >
> >Forwarded Message:
> >From: ivan brown <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> >Dear all,
> >
> >My letter last week on drug testing has been making the "grand
> >rounds" all over Ontario if I can judge by the wide variety of
> >responses I have received from all kinds of people I don't
> >know. Many have suggested additions to the points, such as:
> >If we think it is ok to test welfare recipients, shouldn't we
> >also be testing students who receive OSAP, a program that
> >comes from our taxes? (It is possible a few of them might
> >smoke a joint from time to time...) Shouldn't we be testing
> >those women on materity leave who are now entitled to 50 weeks
> >of EI? After all, the contributions of hard-working people
> >pay for that program and we don't want women who use drugs
> >nursing their babies at home while WE foot the bill!! I must
> >say, I have enjoyed these resonses and got many a chuckle out
> >of them.
> >
> >As part of those rounds the letter has made, someone sent it
> >to Toronto Star columnist Jim Coyle who wrote a column on the
> >topic of drug testing in today's (Nov. 30) Toronto Star. If
> >you have access to the Star, check out this great column. I
> >don't know which section, as I only have a fax copy. You can
> >also read it online at www.thestar.com and search
> >for Jim Coyle's column. Jim has improved on my letter and
> >contrasted my views with Mrs. Malcolm, a grandmother, who
> >said, "Stop feeling sorry for these low-lifes."
> >
> >Well, I guess the world would be a dull place if everyone
> >agreed with my views, but it seems obvious that Mrs. Malcolm
> >has never had to do without in her life. I would very much
> >like to see her live for a year on only the amount welfare
> >provides (including payment of rent), then get back to us with
> >her reactions. I am reminded of the saying
> >updated-for-gender-equality reasons): Never judge a person
> >until you have walked a mile in his or her shoes. (I guess I
> >should update the mile to kilometers as well, but I will
> >indulge in my self-proclaimed right to be a little
> >old-fashioned...) So, have I walked a mile in Mrs.
> >Malcolm's shoes? No, I don't think so. After all, I have
> >never been a grandmother or considered any of my fellow human
> >beings to be low-lifes -- my thinking is that people are who
> >they are, and that diversity is what makes human life so
> >interesting -- so I guess I have to admit that I have never
> >walked a mile in Mrs. Malcolm's shoes. Perhaps I should
> >try. Perhaps then I might have some inkling what on earth
> >would make a grandmother think this way. In any case, I hope
> >those shoes are orthopedics, because the road she is walking
> >down in a rocky one indeed!
> >
> >--
> >Ivan Brown
> >Director, Disability Support Unit
> >Centre for Health Promotion
> >University of Toronto
> >100 College Street, Suite 511
> >Toronto, Canada M5G 1L5
> >
> >Telephone: 416-978-1101
> >Fax: 416-657-2267
> >email: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >Our Web Sites have information and reports from all of our
> >Quality of Life Projects!
> >http://www.utoronto.ca/qol http://www.utoronto.ca/seniors
> >
> >*************************************************************
> >In the early hours I read in the paper of epoch-making
> >projects
> >On the part of pope and sovereigns, bankers and oil barons.
> >With my other eye I watch
> >The pot with the water for my tea
> >The way it clouds and starts to bubble and clears again
> >And overflowing the pot quenches the fire.
> >
> > -- Bertolt Brecht
> >**************************************************************
> >
> >Dennis Raphael, Ph.D.
> >Associate Professor
> >Department of Public Health Sciences
> >Graduate Department of Community Health
> >University of Toronto
> >McMurrich Building, Room 308
> >Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5S 1A8
> >voice: (416) 978-7567
> >fax: (416) 978-2087
> >e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
> http://explorer.msn.com
|
