Hi
The review below and the attached document should provide a good starting point.
Regards,
Helen A Lewis
Dept. of Social & Behavioural Health Sciences
National School of Public Health,
Medical University of Southern Africa
Cell: 0833261400
Tel: +27 12 521 4613
Fax: +27 12 521 4446
Can J Public Health. 2000 Mar-Apr;91(2):137-43. [ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Display&dopt=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=10832181 ]Related Articles, [ javascript:PopUpMenu2_Set(Menu10832181); ]Links
A systematic review of the effectiveness of environmental awareness interventions.
Campbell M, Buckeridge D, Dwyer J, Fong S, Mann V, Sanchez-Sweatman O, Stevens A, Fung L.
Health Promotion & Environmental Protection, Toronto Public Health, ON. [log in to unmask]
PURPOSE: To evaluate and summarize evidence on the effectiveness of interventions available to public health staff regarding the protection of the public from environmental risks. METHOD: This systematic review involved a comprehensive literature search,
screening for relevance, quality assessment of relevant studies, data extraction and synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen of 65 relevant studies were of 'moderate' or 'strong' quality. Intervention types in these 14 studies included: mass campaign, counselling,
school curriculum, educational sessions, and distribution of printed materials. Short-term improvements in awareness or knowledge were observed in 13 of the 14 studies. Eight of 13 studies that examined behavioural outcomes observed short-term
improvements in self-reported behavioural outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Positive short-term changes in health-protective awareness, knowledge and self-reported behaviour appear to be associated with relatively intensive interventions that use multiple methods
and settings, and/or are delivered over multiple sessions.
To unsubscribe send one line: unsubscribe click4hp to: [log in to unmask] . To view archives or modify subscription see: http://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/click4hp.html
|