CLICK4HP Archives

Health Promotion on the Internet

CLICK4HP@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dennis Raphael <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Health Promotion on the Internet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 06:40:48 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (178 bytes) , text/plain (7 kB)
Unless health promoters are prepared to raise and address these issues, they are
wasting their time.
----------------------




 Welfare recipients becoming poorer, new report charges

 By


 MARGARET PHILP  SOCIAL POLICY REPORTER  TORONTO GLOBE AND MAIL  Friday, Apr. 11, 2003                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  People on welfare are poorer than ever across the country, with  social-assistance rates slipping every year and a multibillion-dollar federal  antipoverty program that has ignored the lowest-income Canadians.                                                                                                                                                  In a report released yesterday, the National Council of Welfare lashes out at  the provinces for "punitive and cruel" welfare rates that are "disgracefully  low." It also accuses Ottawa of turning its back on people receiving social  assistance by allowing provinces to claw back a hefty share of benefits  recipients collect under its much-touted National Child Benefit.                                                                                                                                                  Over the years, as some provinces, including Ontario, have slashed welfare  benefits, and others have allowed inflation to eclipse social-assistance  rates, people on welfare have sunk further and further beneath the poverty  line. The gap between their incomes and those of ordinary Canadians has  widened.                                                                                                                                                  Ottawa responded to rising child-poverty rates five years ago with its  National Child Benefit -- a mix of tax breaks and monthly supplements for  low-income families.                                                                                                                                                  But the report shows that while working-poor Canadians have a few more dollars  in their pocket, the government's flagship antipoverty program is failing the  poorest people on social assistance, who were promised they would not lose  ground.                                                                                                                                                  Still, as the number of people collecting a social-assistance cheque plunges  and Ottawa puts more into the NCB -- $10-billion has been budgeted next year  alone -- the provinces are footing the bill for a dwindling share of welfare  recipients' incomes.                                                                                                                                                  "This report shows people are worse off," said John Murphy, chairman of the  welfare council, an advisory body to Human Resources Development Canada.                                                                                                                                                  "That means, to me, that the government needs to address a broken promise.  Welfare rates are abominably low and something needs to be done. The federal  government pours money in, provincial governments are doing nothing, and  people on welfare are falling further behind."                                                                                                                                                  In 2002, the report says, welfare income as a percentage of the poverty line  was as low as 20 per cent for a single able-bodied person in Newfoundland and  Labrador, and as high as 65 per cent for a family of four in Prince Edward  Island.                                                                                                                                                  (The poverty line used in the report is Statistics Canada's low-income cutoff,  a measure that considers families poor if they spend more than 56 per cent of  their total income on food, clothing and shelter. Each year, Statscan  calculates the LICOs for households of different sizes in communities of  different sizes.)                                                                                                                                                  Last year, as the cost of living rose 2.2 per cent, the purchasing power of  welfare benefits in all provinces but Quebec and the Northwest Territories  shrunk.                                                                                                                                                  Between 1986, when the council issued its first report on the welfare systems,  and 2002, social-assistance rates in constant dollars had dropped almost  across the board.                                                                                                                                                  In Manitoba, a family of four on welfare had lost 29 per cent of its income; a  single person in Alberta collected 48 per cent less; and a single parent with  a child in Ontario was surviving on a benefit 24 per cent lower.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

ATOM RSS1 RSS2