Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:29:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you Peter for your message. Unfortunately, it did not reach the
CLICK4HP list, as it had an attachment. The listserv blocks attachments to
prevent transmission of viruses, and to assist many subscribers who pay by
the minute for downloading, and would have difficulty (and costs) in
downloading unexpected attachments. Many email systems also block unexpected
attachments as a virus-prevention measure.
I am copying your message to the list, and encourage interested subscribers
to contact you directly for a copy of your 4 page PDF article. Here is the
abstract from that brief paper "Towards a more unified definition of health
promotion" in the Health Promotion Journal of Australia 2003;14:82-5:
Issues addressed: Health promotion continues to be constrained by the lack
of a consistent, clear and useable definition.
Discussion: The authors reviewed definitions of health promotion from the
international literature and crossreferenced
them with the national health promotion competencies and current health
promotion practice. The key elements of the most widely used concepts of
health promotion have been incorporated into a single definition. A case
study has been used to illustrate its practical nature.
If there is a website that people could go to to access the Health Promotion
Journal of Australia, please let us know! Thanks again for your thoughtful
message and your contributions to this important discussion.
Alison Stirling
co-facilitator, CLICK4HP health promotion listserv
[log in to unmask] OR [log in to unmask]
http://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/click4hp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Howat [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: September 26, 2004 10:20 PM
Sorry to read that health promotion is 'dead' in Canada. It is certainly
alive and flourishing in Australia, but still with many challenges to
continue its development! ( We are sure it is really far from dead in
Canada too!)
Congratulations Eric on your realistic assessment about health promotion.
While debate about what constitutes health promotion can be useful and
help us all examine ways to improve it, taking a dogmatic either / or
stance is unhelpful.
Rather we should be considering health promotion as a continuum where a
wide range of approaches are relevant. In countries where they have
allowed a dichotomous perspective to develop they have found themselves
diminished and often lacking in the skill base to deal with pandemics such
as obesity.
As the recent IUHPE international conference (which Canada is hosting in
2007) indicated there are many terrific health promotion activities being
conducted throughout the world. Let us be careful that we do not undermine
our own achievements. There are enough industry and other groups who are
already trying to do this with out us imploding our own area.
We have attached a brief paper about defining health promotion we prepared
to create debate and hopefully better agreement (and tolerance) about
what constitutes health promotion.
best wishes
Peter Howat and Bruce Maycock
WA Centre for Health Promotion Research
School of Public Health
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth, W Australia 6845
FAX 61-8-9266- 2958 PHONE 61-8-9266-7997
[log in to unmask]
CRICOS Provider Code 00301J
To unsubscribe send one line: unsubscribe click4hp to: [log in to unmask] . To view archives or modify subscription see: http://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/click4hp.html
|
|
|