New paper by Evelyne de Leeuw
We Need Action on Social Determinants of Health – but Do
We Want It, too?
https://t.co/cjt38KADwQ
—
Dr Gemma Carey
NHMRC ECR Fellow
Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet)
H.C Coombs Extension Building (#8 Fellows Road)
Australian National University
Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia
T+61 2 61250537
T 0421132099
F +61 2 61250740
[log in to unmask]
https://www.mup.com.au/items/163717
On 28/02/2016, 4:02 PM, "Social Determinants of Health on behalf of SDOH
automatic digest system" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>There are 2 messages totalling 471 lines in this issue.
>
>Topics of the day:
>
> 1. even more shadowly! (2)
>
>To leave, manage or join list:
>https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:48:29 -0500
>From: Dennis Raphael <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: even more shadowly!
>
><font face=3D"Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size=
>=3D"2"> <span>did any of the 1200+ on this list know about
>this?<br><br><br=
>>http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/department-ministere/state-pub
>>l=
>ic-health-alcohol-2015-etat-sante-publique-alcool/index-eng.php<br><br><br
>>=
><br>Get a free copy of Social Determinants of Health: The Canadian Facts
>at=
> http://thecanadianfacts.org<br><br>Dennis Raphael, PhD<br>Professor of
>Hea=
>lth Policy and Management<br>Graduate Program Director, Health Policy and
>E=
>quity<br>York University<br>4700 Keele Street<br>Room 418, HNES
>Building<br=
>>Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3<br>416-736-2100, ext. 22134<br>email:
>>draphael@yo=
>rku.ca<br>Website:
>http://health.info.yorku.ca/health-profiles/index.php?mi=
>d=3D162284<br><br>Of interest:<br><br>Tackling Health Inequalities:
>Lessons=
> from International Experiences<br>Foreword by Alex
>Scott-Samuel<br>http://=
>www.cspi.org/books/tackling=5Fhealth=5Finequalities<br><br>Poverty in
>Canad=
>a, 2nd edition,<br>Forewords by Rob Ranier and Jack
>Layton<br>http://www.cs=
>pi.org/books/poverty=5Fcanada<br><br>About Canada: Health and
>Illness<br>ht=
>tp://tinyurl.com/2c2tm6l<br><br>Health Promotion and Quality of Life in
>Can=
>ada: Essential Readings<br>http://tinyurl.com/3C8zteu<br><br>Social
>Determi=
>nants of Health: Canadian Perspectives, 2nd edition, <br>Forewords by
>Carol=
>yn Bennett and Roy Romanow<br>http://tinyurl.com/3fkbr8u<br><br>Staying
>Ali=
>ve: Critical Perspectives on Health, Illness, and Health Care, 2nd
>edition =
><br>Foreword by Gary Teeple<br>http://tinyurl.com/4xlu4up<br><br>See a
>pres=
>entation! The Political Economy of Health
>Inequalities.<br>http://www.yout=
>ube.com/watch?v=3D-NCTYqAub8g<br><br>Also, presentation at the University
>o=
>f Toronto on how Canada stacks up again other nations in providing
>citizens=
> with economic and social security.<br>http://vimeo.com/33346501<br>
><br>Se=
>e what Jack Layton had to say about my
>books!<br>http://www.cbc.ca/news/can=
>ada/story/2011/04/10/cv-election-ndp-layton-platform.html<br>at
>27:20</spa=
>n><div></div></font>
>To leave, manage or join list:
>https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3Dsdoh&A=3D1
><p>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:47:17 -0500
>From: David Langille <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: even more shadowly!
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>--------------050304010504030505040708
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>I had not heard of the *Chief Public Health Officer's Report on the
>State of Public Health in Canada, 2015: Alcohol Consumption in Canada*
>I did a google search -- the report did not seem to have received much
>coverage.
>Was that because the alcohol industry did everything in their power to
>suppress it?
>
>Or does this recent article in Maclean's magazine offer a better
>explanation?Why Britain’s stiff upper lip on stiff drinks is nonsense -
><http://www.macleans.ca/news/world/why-britains-stiff-upper-lip-on-stiff-d
>rinks-is-nonsense/>Britain’s
>new puritanical alcohol guidelines make Canada’s rules seem downright
>sensible<http://www.macleans.ca/news/world/why-britains-stiff-upper-lip-on
>-stiff-drinks-is-nonsense/>
>macleans.ca <http://www.macleans.ca/author/macleans-ca/> January 22, 2016
>/
>//A cuppa tea and a pint of beer. A great deal of British history and
>tradition can be found in these two beverages and their rites of
>consumption. Now, however, the country’s top public health official is
>playing favourites. Last week, Dame Sally Davies, Britain’s chief
>medical officer, dramatically lowered her country’s recommended alcohol
>consumption guidelines. No level of drinking is entirely safe, she
>warns. “Drink . . . a cup of tea instead of a glass of wine. And save
>the wine for a special occasion,” is her advice. The folks down at the
>local pub likely have other ideas. /
>
>/As most countries do, Britain suggests maximum weekly alcohol
>consumption limits to its citizens. The new guidelines are six standard
>beers or glasses of wine per week for both men and women, with no more
>than two drinks per day. This is down from an earlier guideline of nine
>drinks a week for men, while the limit for women is unchanged. Davies
>makes it clear, however, that her ideal policy is complete prohibition.
>“Drinking any level of alcohol regularly carries a health risk,” she
>states ominously. The move has sparked widespread mockery in Britain for
>its “scaremongering,” as well as its lack of sociability. /*/It has also
>revealed Canada’s alcohol guidelines to be—perhaps surprisingly—a model
>of practicality and common sense./*
>
>/*T**he advice from Davies on drinking is typical of most public health
>discussions these days: it fixates on the minuscule potential risks of
>everyday activities while ignoring a whole range of broader, socially
>relevant benefits. Driven solely by research on the small but detectable
>incidence of various cancers arising from alcohol consumption, Britain’s
>new rules deliberately overstate the real dangers at play. Davies is
>thus following the trail blazed by hand-wringers at the World Health
>Organization, who recently placed bacon and other tasty and nutritious
>meat products on the list with plutonium and asbestos as known
>carcinogens. Davies’s efforts are likely to be ignored in the same
>comprehensive fashion as the anti-bacon crusade.*//**
>
>*There’s a lesson here for public health officials everywhere: if you
>want to have an impact on public behaviour, stop spouting nonsense. A
>well-established body of medical research convincingly proves that
>moderate levels of alcohol consumption are associated with many
>significant health advantages. The most impressive of these is that
>people who have two or three drinks per day tend to live noticeably
>longer than either abstainers or heavy drinkers. Regular but modest
>consumption of beer, wine or spirits is further linked to lower levels
>of heart disease, stroke and diabetes, and may even ward off the common
>cold. And since it enhances social interaction, moderate imbibing also
>appears to improve mental health and lower rates of depression.
>Britain’s puritanical new standards ignore these many benefits; Davies
>pointedly dismisses any health advantages of red wine as an “old wives’
>tale.” Canada, it turns out, takes a much more enlightened view of
>alcohol and its impacts.*
>
>Released in 2011 by the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (CCSA),
>Canada’s “Low-Risk Alcohol Drinking Guidelines” recommend no more than
>15 bottles of beer or glasses of wine per week for men. For women, it’s
>10 drinks. In general men should limit themselves to three drinks per
>day and women two, although the rules contemplate one extra each on
>special occasions. The U.S. recommends no more than two drinks per day
>for men and one for women. (Gender differences are typical in alcohol
>guidance, given differences in body weight and tolerance. The new
>British rules are unique in their unisex approach.) With overall limits
>more in line with typical consumption patterns−and thus more likely to
>be adhered to−Canada’s rules are informed by an appropriately modern
>view of the science and morality of drinking.
>
>The Canadian weekly alcohol consumption standard is set such that the
>“potential health risks and benefits from drinking exactly cancel each
>other out,” according to a CCSA background report. The guideline doesn’t
>view drinking as a public vice to be eradicated, as is the assumption
>behind Britain’s prohibitionary urges, but rather a complex social
>activity with identifiable risks and rewards in need of balance. There’s
>no ignoring the obvious dangers of drinking to excess—not only from
>increased cancer, but also alcoholism, underage and binge drinking,
>drunk driving and many other dangers. At the same time, Canada’s rules
>properly recognize the many medical, personal and social advantages of
>sensible drinking. As with all pleasures, alcohol is best enjoyed in
>moderation, and with others.
>
>/______
>I think alcohol consumption in Canada is a problem for two reasons
>likely not identified in the literature:
>
>1. The opportunity costs involved -- In fiscal year 2013-2014, $20.5
>billion worth of alcohol was sold in Canada. Costs related to alcohol
>in Canada were about $14.6 billion in 2002, a figure that would be much
>higher in 2015. Perhaps the total is $40 billion or more per year.
>Imagine how that money might have been better spent improving the social
>determinants of health -- it would be enough for a national child care
>program, free post-secondary education and affordable housing.
>
>2. The political costs involved -- rather than respond to increasing
>inequality, economic insecurity and climate change by drowning our
>sorrows with alcohol, imagine how we might build a better world..
>(It's time for me to re-read Aldous Huxley
><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldous_Huxley>'s 1932 novel, /Brave New
>World <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World>/ -- where people
>were pacified with "soma" -- a fictional drug offering both intoxicating
>and psychoactive properties -- /"all of the benefits of Christianity and
>alcohol without their defects.")//
>
>David Langille
>/
>
>On 2/27/2016 5:48 PM, Dennis Raphael wrote:
>> did any of the 1200+ on this list know about this?
>>
>>
>>
>>http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/department-ministere/state-pub
>>lic-health-alcohol-2015-etat-sante-publique-alcool/index-eng.php
>>
>>
>>
>> Get a free copy of Social Determinants of Health: The Canadian Facts
>> at http://thecanadianfacts.org
>>
>> Dennis Raphael, PhD
>> Professor of Health Policy and Management
>> Graduate Program Director, Health Policy and Equity
>> York University
>> 4700 Keele Street
>> Room 418, HNES Building
>> Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
>> 416-736-2100, ext. 22134
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>> Website:
>>http://health.info.yorku.ca/health-profiles/index.php?mid=162284
>>
>> Of interest:
>>
>> Tackling Health Inequalities: Lessons from International Experiences
>> Foreword by Alex Scott-Samuel
>> http://www.cspi.org/books/tackling_health_inequalities
>>
>> Poverty in Canada, 2nd edition,
>> Forewords by Rob Ranier and Jack Layton
>> http://www.cspi.org/books/poverty_canada
>>
>> About Canada: Health and Illness
>> http://tinyurl.com/2c2tm6l
>>
>> Health Promotion and Quality of Life in Canada: Essential Readings
>> http://tinyurl.com/3C8zteu
>>
>> Social Determinants of Health: Canadian Perspectives, 2nd edition,
>> Forewords by Carolyn Bennett and Roy Romanow
>> http://tinyurl.com/3fkbr8u
>>
>> Staying Alive: Critical Perspectives on Health, Illness, and Health
>> Care, 2nd edition
>> Foreword by Gary Teeple
>> http://tinyurl.com/4xlu4up
>>
>> See a presentation! The Political Economy of Health Inequalities.
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NCTYqAub8g
>>
>> Also, presentation at the University of Toronto on how Canada stacks
>> up again other nations in providing citizens with economic and social
>> security.
>> http://vimeo.com/33346501
>>
>> See what Jack Layton had to say about my books!
>>
>>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/04/10/cv-election-ndp-layton-pla
>>tform.html
>> at 27:20 To leave, manage or join list:
>> https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1
>>
>
>--
>David Langille
>Course Director
>Work and Labour Studies Program
>Department of Social Sciences
>York University, Toronto
>[log in to unmask] 647 280 7747
>
>
>To leave, manage or join list:
>https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1
>
>
>--------------050304010504030505040708
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
><html>
> <head>
> <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
> I had not heard of the <b>Chief Public Health Officer's Report on
> the State of Public Health in Canada, 2015: Alcohol Consumption in
> Canada</b><br>
> I did a google search -- the report did not seem to have received
> much coverage.<br>
> Was that because the alcohol industry did everything in their power
> to suppress it?<br>
> <br>
> Or does this recent article in Maclean's magazine offer a better
> explanation?<small><small> <a
>href="http://www.macleans.ca/news/world/why-britains-stiff-upper-lip-on-st
>iff-drinks-is-nonsense/"><big>Why
> Britain’s stiff upper lip on stiff drinks is nonsense
>-</big></a></small></small><a
>href="http://www.macleans.ca/news/world/why-britains-stiff-upper-lip-on-st
>iff-drinks-is-nonsense/"><small>
> Britain’s new puritanical alcohol guidelines make Canada’s rules
> seem downright sensible</small><span
>itemprop="author"></span></a><a
> href="http://www.macleans.ca/author/macleans-ca/" title="Posts by
> macleans.ca" class="url fn" rel="author"> macleans.ca</a>
> January 22, 2016 <span itemprop="author"></span>
> <div class="author"><span class="author-information-box"> </span>
></div>
> <i><br>
> </i><i>A cuppa tea and a pint of beer. A great deal of British
> history and tradition can be found in these two beverages and
> their rites of consumption. Now, however, the country’s top public
> health official is playing favourites. Last week, Dame Sally
> Davies, Britain’s chief medical officer, dramatically lowered her
> country’s recommended alcohol consumption guidelines. No level of
> drinking is entirely safe, she warns. “Drink . . . a cup of tea
> instead of a glass of wine. And save the wine for a special
> occasion,” is her advice. The folks down at the local pub likely
> have other ideas.
> </i>
> <p><i>As most countries do, Britain suggests maximum weekly alcohol
> consumption limits to its citizens. The new guidelines are six
> standard beers or glasses of wine per week for both men and
> women, with no more than two drinks per day. This is down from
> an earlier guideline of nine drinks a week for men, while the
> limit for women is unchanged. Davies makes it clear, however,
> that her ideal policy is complete prohibition. “Drinking any
> level of alcohol regularly carries a health risk,” she states
> ominously. The move has sparked widespread mockery in Britain
> for its “scaremongering,” as well as its lack of sociability.
></i><b><i><span
> itemprop="articleBody" class="entry-content">It has also
> revealed Canada’s alcohol guidelines to be—perhaps
> surprisingly—a model of practicality and common
>sense.</span></i></b></p>
> <i><b>T</b><b>he advice from Davies on drinking is typical of most
> public health discussions these days: it fixates on the
> minuscule potential risks of everyday activities while ignoring
> a whole range of broader, socially relevant benefits. Driven
> solely by research on the small but detectable incidence of
> various cancers arising from alcohol consumption, Britain’s new
> rules deliberately overstate the real dangers at play. Davies is
> thus following the trail blazed by hand-wringers at the World
> Health Organization, who recently placed bacon and other tasty
> and nutritious meat products on the list with plutonium and
> asbestos as known carcinogens. Davies’s efforts are likely to be
> ignored in the same comprehensive fashion as the anti-bacon
> crusade.</b></i><i><span itemprop="articleBody"
> class="entry-content"><b> </b>
> <p><b>There’s a lesson here for public health officials
> everywhere: if you want to have an impact on public
> behaviour, stop spouting nonsense. A well-established body
> of medical research convincingly proves that moderate levels
> of alcohol consumption are associated with many significant
> health advantages. The most impressive of these is that
> people who have two or three drinks per day tend to live
> noticeably longer than either abstainers or heavy drinkers.
> Regular but modest consumption of beer, wine or spirits is
> further linked to lower levels of heart disease, stroke and
> diabetes, and may even ward off the common cold. And since
> it enhances social interaction, moderate imbibing also
> appears to improve mental health and lower rates of
> depression. Britain’s puritanical new standards ignore these
> many benefits; Davies pointedly dismisses any health
> advantages of red wine as an “old wives’ tale.” Canada, it
> turns out, takes a much more enlightened view of alcohol and
> its impacts.</b></p>
> <p>Released in 2011 by the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse
> (CCSA), Canada’s “Low-Risk Alcohol Drinking Guidelines”
> recommend no more than 15 bottles of beer or glasses of wine
> per week for men. For women, it’s 10 drinks. In general men
> should limit themselves to three drinks per day and women two,
> although the rules contemplate one extra each on special
> occasions. The U.S. recommends no more than two drinks per day
> for men and one for women. (Gender differences are typical in
> alcohol guidance, given differences in body weight and
> tolerance. The new British rules are unique in their unisex
> approach.) With overall limits more in line with typical
> consumption patterns−and thus more likely to be adhered
> to−Canada’s rules are informed by an appropriately modern view
> of the science and morality of drinking.</p>
> <p>The Canadian weekly alcohol consumption standard is set such
> that the “potential health risks and benefits from drinking
> exactly cancel each other out,” according to a CCSA background
> report. The guideline doesn’t view drinking as a public vice
> to be eradicated, as is the assumption behind Britain’s
> prohibitionary urges, but rather a complex social activity
> with identifiable risks and rewards in need of balance.
> There’s no ignoring the obvious dangers of drinking to
> excess—not only from increased cancer, but also alcoholism,
> underage and binge drinking, drunk driving and many other
> dangers. At the same time, Canada’s rules properly recognize
> the many medical, personal and social advantages of sensible
> drinking. As with all pleasures, alcohol is best enjoyed in
> moderation, and with others.</p>
> </span></i>______<br>
> I think alcohol consumption in Canada is a problem for two reasons
> likely not identified in the literature:<br>
> <br>
> 1. The opportunity costs involved -- In fiscal year 2013-2014,
> $20.5 billion worth of alcohol was sold in Canada. Costs related to
> alcohol in Canada were about $14.6 billion in 2002, a figure that
> would be much higher in 2015. Perhaps the total is $40 billion or
> more per year. Imagine how that money might have been better spent
> improving the social determinants of health -- it would be enough
> for a national child care program, free post-secondary education and
> affordable housing. <br>
> <br>
> 2. The political costs involved -- rather than respond to increasing
> inequality, economic insecurity and climate change by drowning our
> sorrows with alcohol, imagine how we might build a better
> world.. (It's time for me to re-read <a
> href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldous_Huxley" title="Aldous
> Huxley">Aldous Huxley</a>'s 1932 novel, <i><a
> href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World"
> title="Brave New World">Brave New World</a></i> -- where people
> were pacified with "soma" -- a fictional drug offering both
> intoxicating and psychoactive properties -- <i>"all of the benefits
> of Christianity and alcohol without their defects.")</i><i><br>
> <br>
> David Langille<br>
> </i><br>
> <br>
> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/27/2016 5:48 PM, Dennis Raphael
> wrote:<br>
> </div>
> <blockquote
>cite="mid:[log in to unmask]
>ca"
> type="cite"><font size="2" face="Default Sans
> Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"> <span>did any of the
> 1200+ on this list know about this?<br>
> <br>
> <br>
><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/department-ministere/stat
>e-public-health-alcohol-2015-etat-sante-publique-alcool/index-eng.php">htt
>p://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/department-ministere/state-public-
>health-alcohol-2015-etat-sante-publique-alcool/index-eng.php</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Get a free copy of Social Determinants of Health: The Canadian
> Facts at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://thecanadianfacts.org">http://thecanadianfacts.org</a><br>
> <br>
> Dennis Raphael, PhD<br>
> Professor of Health Policy and Management<br>
> Graduate Program Director, Health Policy and Equity<br>
> York University<br>
> 4700 Keele Street<br>
> Room 418, HNES Building<br>
> Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3<br>
> 416-736-2100, ext. 22134<br>
> email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
>href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</a><br>
> Website:
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://health.info.yorku.ca/health-profiles/index.php?mid=162284">ht
>tp://health.info.yorku.ca/health-profiles/index.php?mid=162284</a><br>
> <br>
> Of interest:<br>
> <br>
> Tackling Health Inequalities: Lessons from International
> Experiences<br>
> Foreword by Alex Scott-Samuel<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://www.cspi.org/books/tackling_health_inequalities">http://www.c
>spi.org/books/tackling_health_inequalities</a><br>
> <br>
> Poverty in Canada, 2nd edition,<br>
> Forewords by Rob Ranier and Jack Layton<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://www.cspi.org/books/poverty_canada">http://www.cspi.org/books/
>poverty_canada</a><br>
> <br>
> About Canada: Health and Illness<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://tinyurl.com/2c2tm6l">http://tinyurl.com/2c2tm6l</a><br>
> <br>
> Health Promotion and Quality of Life in Canada: Essential
> Readings<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://tinyurl.com/3C8zteu">http://tinyurl.com/3C8zteu</a><br>
> <br>
> Social Determinants of Health: Canadian Perspectives, 2nd
> edition, <br>
> Forewords by Carolyn Bennett and Roy Romanow<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://tinyurl.com/3fkbr8u">http://tinyurl.com/3fkbr8u</a><br>
> <br>
> Staying Alive: Critical Perspectives on Health, Illness, and
> Health Care, 2nd edition <br>
> Foreword by Gary Teeple<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://tinyurl.com/4xlu4up">http://tinyurl.com/4xlu4up</a><br>
> <br>
> See a presentation! The Political Economy of Health
> Inequalities.<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NCTYqAub8g">http://www.youtube.com/w
>atch?v=-NCTYqAub8g</a><br>
> <br>
> Also, presentation at the University of Toronto on how Canada
> stacks up again other nations in providing citizens with
> economic and social security.<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://vimeo.com/33346501">http://vimeo.com/33346501</a><br>
> <br>
> See what Jack Layton had to say about my books!<br>
><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/04/10/cv-election-ndp-layto
>n-platform.html">http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/04/10/cv-electio
>n-ndp-layton-platform.html</a><br>
> at 27:20</span></font>
> To leave, manage or join list:
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>href="https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1">https://li
>stserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1</a>
> <p>
> </p>
> </blockquote>
> <br>
> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
>David Langille
>Course Director
>Work and Labour Studies Program
>Department of Social Sciences
>York University, Toronto
><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
>href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</a> 647 280 7747 </pre>
> </body>
></html>
>To leave, manage or join list:
>https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1
><p>
>
>--------------050304010504030505040708--
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of SDOH Digest - 27 Feb 2016 (#2016-54)
>*******************************************
|
