SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dennis Raphael <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:32:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (132 lines)
[Ontario plans to deny driver's licenses to high school drop-outs - dr]

http://tinyurl.com/ktpfq


Unfair punishment for dropouts
Aug. 23, 2006. 01:00 AM
CAROL GOAR, Toronto Star

One of the threads Liberal leadership contender Gerard Kennedy left
dangling when he stepped down as Ontario education minister was a bill
depriving anyone who quits school before 18 of the right to hold a driver's
licence.

It would have been best to let it drop. The measure is clumsy, coercive and
unduly harsh on rural teens.

But Kennedy's replacement, Sandra Pupatello, is determined to tie up loose
ends. After four days' debate this spring, she whisked the bill off to a
legislative committee for line-by-line scrutiny. "We are hoping to see it
approved as soon as possible," said a ministerial aide. "This is a priority
for this government."

The committee, chaired by government backbencher Bob Delaney of Mississauga
West, isn't likely to provide much resistance. Eight of its 11 members are
Liberals. Only two (both Conservatives) represent rural ridings.

There is still one chance — albeit a slim one — to halt this rush to
punish.

The committee will hold three public hearings next week. On Tuesday (Aug.
29), it will be in Whitchurch-Stouffville. On Wednesday, it will move to
Hamilton. On Thursday, it will visit Leamington.

The meetings haven't been widely publicized. The timing isn't convenient.
And people can't just show up and speak. In order to comment on the
legislation, an individual must notify the clerk of the committee by 4 p.m.
today. (Tonia Grannum can be reached at 416-325-3519.)

Clearly, the government isn't encouraging citizens to express their views.
But it is worth making the effort. Here's why:

This isn't what Ontarians voted for. Dalton McGuinty never told electors
his government would deny driver's licences to 16- and 17-year-olds who
dropped out of school. He said the Liberals would require young people to
stay in school or an approved training program until 18 years of age. But
there was no mention of using an enforcement technique that is totally
unrelated to academic attainment.

Neither Kennedy nor Pupatello has produced a shred of evidence that this
approach works. Nine American states have made school attendance mandatory
to get a driver's licence, but none has shown that the requirement reduces
truancy. Politicians think it does. Educators acknowledge that wheels give
kids power and status. But no one has been able to establish a clear link.

The policy sends a troubling message to young people: Your government knows
what's best for you. It will bully you into submitting, regardless of your
needs or circumstances. It knows that you, unlike an adult, don't have the
power to fight back.

It wasn't the kids who broke the education system. It was the government of
Mike Harris. The Tories put in place a curriculum that sent failure rates
soaring and provided no practical help to students who weren't bound for
university or college. To McGuinty's credit, the Liberals have begun to
straighten out the mess. Until they finish the job, penalizing the victims
of a bad policy would be patently unfair.

Stripping youths who already are at high risk of unemployment of one of the
few qualifications they can use to get a job is counterproductive. It will
worsen their plight and increase the odds they'll end up on welfare or turn
to crime.

The burden of this sanction will fall disproportionately on rural families.
Not only will teens have to depend on their parents to get around. They
won't be able to take over farm responsibilities or drive relatives to
medical appointments.

Middle-class politicians have little understanding of the forces that drive
disadvantaged kids to leave school. It could be ostracism or shame or
bullying. It could be a poor grasp of English (funding for language
instruction has been cut.) It could be an undiagnosed mental illness. It
could be a learning disability. It could be the need to have what other
kids have. It could be a hunger to succeed at something — anything.

"This is mean and I don't think it's going to work," said Miriam Kaufman,
an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Toronto who
specializes in adolescent medicine.

Like most educators, parents and citizens, she supports the goal of keeping
kids in school longer. But she finds the means crude and offensive.

One of the essentials of good discipline, Kaufman says, is a clear link
between actions and consequences. If a young driver breaks the rules of the
road, it would be fair to suspend his or her licence. But there is no
connection between being a competent driver and attending high school.

"I was a high-school dropout and it didn't stop me from getting a licence
to practise medicine," she said. "This just doesn't make sense."

If a few articulate voters — better still a few hundred — delivered that
message to the Liberals next week, they might listen. Otherwise, they'll
hear it at the ballot box.

(Information about the hearings can be found at
http:http://www.ontla.on.ca/committees/leg_assembly.htm).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carol Goar's column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday.

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2