http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/050927/d050927a.htm

Study: Access to professional programs amid the deregulation of tuition
fees
1995 to 2002
Tuition fees for professional programs in Ontario's universities soared
during the late 1990s, nearly quadrupling in the case of medicine and
almost tripling for law.

A new study has found that these big jumps were associated with substantial
changes in the likelihood that students from different socio-economic
backgrounds would enrol in medicine, law or dentistry programs.

The study found evidence that enrolment among Ontario university students
from the most highly educated parents, whose parents held a graduate or
professional degree, rose considerably in these programs following the
substantial jump in fees.

Similarly, enrolment among Ontario students from less educated parents,
whose parents had no post-secondary qualifications, also rose during this
period, possibly as a result of increased student aid.

However, the only group that experienced declines in enrolment included
Ontario students from middle educated parents, whose parents had
post-secondary qualifications below a graduate degree.

While the study does not determine the reason for this decline, it is
possible that some students in this group either could not afford or chose
not to pay the higher fees, and did not qualify for as much student aid as
students from less educated families.

These changes in enrolment patterns in professional programs by
socio-economic background were most evident in Ontario, where the largest
fee increases were observed. Provinces such as Quebec and British Columbia
froze tuition fees during the period, and saw no change in enrolment by
socio-economic background.

Other provinces saw moderate increases in tuition fees and moderate changes
in enrolment patterns in professional programs across the socio-economic
spectrum.

The study used data from the National Graduates Survey (NGS), which covered
individuals who graduated from a university degree program in 1995 and
2000. They were interviewed two years later and asked about any programs in
which they had enrolled since graduation, including professional programs.

Although the NGS contained no information on family income, it used the
level of education of parents as an indication of socio-economic status.

All enrolment figures reported were adjusted to account for differences in
sex, age, marital status, presence of children, as well as previous
educational level, field of study, and scholarships.

Previous studies focused on tuition fee changes in undergraduate programs
during the 1990s, and found no changes in enrolment patterns. The reason
may have possibly been that the fee increases were much smaller and more
gradual than what was registered in professional programs.

Increase in fees particularly large and sudden in Ontario programs
Tuition fees in Canadian undergraduate programs have been rising since the
late 1980s. However, the increases were not evenly distributed, and they
were particularly large, and sudden, in professional programs such as
medicine, dentistry and law.

Between the academic years 1995/96 to 2001/02, tuition fees in Canada rose
80% in law and 160% in medicine, and tripled in dentistry. This was well
above gains of about 50% in all undergraduate disciplines.

These increases were largely the product of trends in Ontario, where fees
in professional programs were deregulated in 1998. This resulted in
dramatic increases for medicine, where fees nearly quadrupled; dentistry,
where they rose almost five-fold; and law, where they nearly tripled.

In contrast, Quebec and British Columbia continued to regulate fees over
the same period. In British Columbia, tuition fees fell moderately, with
declines of 3% in medicine and dentistry and 5% in law. In Quebec, fees
remained stable in law, while increasing around 44% in medicine and 27% in
dentistry.

Other provinces had already deregulated fees, or experimented with
deregulation to varying degrees. This resulted in fee increases for Nova
Scotia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, that lay somewhere between the
two extremes of Ontario on the one end, and Quebec and British Columbia on
the other.

Enrolment patterns by socio-economic background changed most in Ontario
During the period of rapidly rising tuition fees in Ontario professional
programs, recent university graduates from the most well educated families,
whose parents held a graduate or professional degree, became much more
likely to pursue professional degrees.

Prior to the jump in fees, 2.4% of these students pursued a professional
degree, compared to 5.2% after the fee increase. Capacity in professional
programs increased during the period, possibly a result of the deregulation
of tuition fees or increased pressures to train more professionals. This
allowed more students to enter.

Ontario students from the least educated families, whose parents had no
post-secondary qualifications, were also more likely to pursue professional
degrees following the deregulation of tuition fees. Their likelihood of
enrolment rose from 0.5% to 1.2% over the period.

Although the study did not determine the reason for this increase, it is
possible that increased access to student aid may have played a role.

Students from less educated families could also have avoided the high
tuition fees by enrolling in similar, but less expensive programs in other
provinces.

The group of students that saw a decline in enrolment consisted of Ontario
students whose parents had post-secondary qualifications below a graduate
degree. They saw their likelihood of enrolment decline from 2% prior to the
jump in fees to 1% after the fee increase.

It is possible that some students in this group either could not afford or
chose not to pay the higher fees, and did not qualify for as much student
aid as students from less educated families.

In Quebec and British Columbia, where fees remained relatively stable,
there were no changes in enrolment patterns across the socio-economic
spectrum. In particular, no declines in enrolment were registered among
students in these provinces from middle educated parents.

The other provinces saw moderate increases in tuition fees and a moderate
change in enrolment patterns across the socio-economic spectrum.

Students whose parents held a professional degree most likely to pursue a
professional degree
Students whose parents held a professional degree were the most likely
group to have pursued a professional degree themselves, according to the
study.

For example, among the class of 2000, the proportion of these students who
pursued a professional degree was 7.6 percentage points higher than
students whose parents had no post-secondary qualifications.

This was a large difference, considering that fewer than 2% of students
pursued a professional degree.

In contrast, students from the class of 2000 whose parents held a doctorate
only had a 2.7 percentage point advantage over students whose parents had
no post-secondary qualifications. The advantage for students whose parents
held a master's degree was even smaller (1.1 percentage points).

The study also found that students with a parent holding a bachelor's
degree had little or no advantage over students whose parents had no
post-secondary qualifications.

Definitions, data sources and methods: survey number 5012.

The research paper The Impact of Tuition Fees on University Access:
Evidence from a Large-scale Price Deregulation in Professional Programs
(11F0019MIE2005263, free) is now available online. A short version of this
study entitled Summary of: The Impact of Tuition Fees on University Access:
Evidence from a Large-scale Price Deregulation in Professional Programs
(11F0019MIE2005264, free) is also available. From our home page select
Studies, then under Browse periodical and series choose Free and for sale.
Under Series select Analytical Studies Branch.

Related studies from the Business and Labour Market Analysis Division can
be found at Update on Analytical Studies (11-015-XIE, free) on our Web
site.

For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data
quality of this release, contact Marc Frenette (613-951-4228;
[log in to unmask]), Business and Labour Market Analysis Division.

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html