As I wrote on my blog a couple of weeks ago, electoral reform is the most pressing issue facing the electorate - both 
those who still vote and those who have given up and no longer do. 

Yet nowhere in the Liberal Party's 66-page plan is there mention of electoral reform or proportional representation.* 

How could a party claiming to care about making this country a "fairer Canada," about "enabl[ing] every Canadian to 
realize their full potential" omit electoral reform? 

How could it not see that a disenfranchised electorate means more and more citizens becoming disillusioned about and 
disengaged from their political institutions? 

Under an eroding democracy, only the few can realize their potential - the corporate backers and moneyed lobbyists 
who stand closest to and pull the strings of those (seen to be) in power. 

The voices of the many, the majority who vote other than for the party which forms government, are left out.

If we had proportional representation, then all votes would matter in this federal election. And if they did, then likely 
more people would return to the voting booth, more would become re-engaged not just federally, but locally and 
provincially. 

Because then, we'd see that our opinion and voices do count.

Instead, with our first-past-the-post system, there is a chance that Canadians will get the "majority" Stephen Harper has 
been threatening, and on the basis of less than 38% of the popular vote - not 50% + 1, as a true majority would warrant.

That the Liberal Party of Canada has left the issue of electoral reform out of its plan speaks volumes and can be related 
to its handling of municipalities, which I've also written about.

It's about Power. 

Consider the wording in the section on dealing with municipalities and the "infrastructure deficit": 

"A Liberal government will be upfront and transparent about the priorities we will pursue in our discussions with the 
provinces and municipalities" (p12).

Not priorities as determined by community governments which are in the best position to know what their communities 
need most, what solutions would work best, but priorities as set by the federal government. Once again, municipalities 
must come with hands out, begging, rather than being empowered - by retaining one cent of the GST collected per 
dollar sale, for example - to determine their own destinies.

* I did the search this morning for 'elect', 'proportional' and 'reform' - nothing. Then went to the LPC's website and did a 
similar search. 'Electoral' comes up in a description of one of their candidates; the rest of the one-page search result 
yields the word in connection with financing and EDAs. 'Reform' yields nothing about how we vote. 'Proportional' comes 
up once, but under the subject of crime.

NB: The Greens include ER and PR on p. 114 of their 121-page Vision Green plan. NDP include a section on voting 
reform on their website. Am unsure if the NDP has released its printed platform yet or if it does/will include this issue.

NB2: The above was sent by email to the LPC, also to Fair Vote Canada for distribution to their email list. The full post 
was also published to my other blogs, including the new one at DemocraticSpace.ca.


Ocean

WISE Book - Policies of Exclusion, Poverty & Health: Stories from the front
Podcast Channel: http://bcseawalker.podbean.com/
Personal Blog: Challenging the Commonplace - and other irreverent activities
http://challengingthecommonplace.blogspot.com/

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html