TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bob Gill <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 18:48:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>(And, please, I didn't include the Brooks quote to renew an 80-year-old debate
>on the Forum.  It's safe to assume that the vast majority of Forum members
>disagree with Brooks' analysis.)
>

  I do disagree, but I think there's some value in "The Ordeal of Mark Twain"
anyway. To my knowledge, Brooks was the first critic to pick up on some key
contradictions in Twain's character -- his stance as a rebel but his desire
for the approval of the establishment, for instance. Brooks' explanation of
these things has been pretty generally debunked by now, I assume, but I think
he deserves some credit for pointing these things out. To a degree, his book
determined the course of much Twain scholarship for the next 50 years or
thereabouts. Sometimes an erroneous hypothesis can still lead to productive
work, and I think Brooks qualifies.

 -- Bob G.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2