Forwarded Message:
From: Stephen Bezruchka <[log in to unmask]>
This important message finally made it into a major media outlet.
Stephen
************
Is Our Society Making You Sick? Americas health lags behind that of more
egalitarian nations. Economic equality is the medicine we need By Stephen
Bezruchka, M.D NEWSWEEK Feb. 26 2001 issue My Turn section
(http://www.msnbc.com/news/532083.asp)
Americans are obsessed with health. Just look at todays magazines, TV
shows, Web sites, self-help books--and where we put our dollars. As a
country, we make up about 4 percent of the worlds total population, yet we
expend almost half of all the money spent on medical care. We should be
pretty healthy.
YET I HAVE ALWAYS been amazed at how poorly the United States ranks in
health when compared with other countries. When I began medical school in
1970 we stood about 15th in what I call the Health Olympics, the ranking
of countries by life expectancy or infant mortality. Twenty years later we
were about 20th, and in recent years we have plunged even further to
around 25th, behind almost all rich countries and a few poor ones. For the
richest and most powerful country in the worlds history, this is a
disgrace.
As a physician obsessed with understanding what makes groups of people
healthy, Im dumbfounded that our low ranking doesnt raise more concern in
the medical and public-health communities. Is it because experts in these
fields dont want to question the role of medical care in producing health?
Does our focus on diseases--including the search for risk factors, cures
and specific preventive answers--stop Americans from looking at what would
really keep us well?
Research during this last decade has shown that the health of a group of
people is not affected substantially by individual behaviors such as
smoking, diet and exercise, by genetics or by the use of health care. In
countries where basic goods are readily available, peoples life span
depends on the hierarchical structure of their society; that is, the size
of the gap between rich and poor.
How can hierarchy affect health? Consider the feelings that predominate in
a hierarchical situation: power, domination, coercion (if you are on top);
resignation, resentment and submission (if you are on the bottom). Compare
them with feelings in an egalitarian environment: support, friendship,
cooperation and sociability. Studies with baboons in Kenya and macaque
monkeys in captivity, both of which feature strong hierarchical
relationships, show that high-ranking animals are healthier than those
lower in the pecking order. Human population studies show additional
findings. The death rate from heart attacks among middle-aged men is four
times greater in Lithuania than in Sweden, which is much more egalitarian.
We can learn something by looking at countries that do well in the Health
Olympics. In 1960 Japan stood 23d, but by 1977 it had overtaken all the
others in the health race. Today, at No. 1, Japan has a life expectancy on
average three and a half years longer than the United States. Twice as
many Japanese men as American men smoke, yet the deaths attributable to
smoking are half of ours. Why? After the second world war, the
hierarchical structure of Japan was reorganized so all citizens shared
more equally in the economy. Today Japanese CEOs make 15 to 20 times
what
entry-level workers make, not the almost 500-fold difference in this
country. During their recent economic crisis, CEOs and managers in Japan
took cuts in pay rather than lay off workers. That the structure of
society is key to well-being becomes evident when we look at Japanese who
emigrate: their health declines to the level of the inhabitants of the new
country.
Did this health-hierarchy relationship always exist--is it part of human
nature? Archeological records from burial mounds and skeletal remains
indicate that human populations were relatively healthy before the advent
of agriculture. The development of farming allowed food to be produced in
quantities and stored, enabling some to live off the efforts of others--a
hierarchy. With agriculture, health declined, nutrition worsened and
workload increased. Why has the medical community, as well as the popular
press, essentially ignored these findings? I suspect that part of the
explanation lies in Americans "cradle to grave" relationship with the
health-care industry, which represents one seventh of the U.S. economy.
If equality is good medicine, then what can be done to improve Americans
well-being? Our primary goal should be to reduce todays record gap between
rich and poor. Prescriptions for such "structural medicine" might include
a tax on consumption rather than income, or increased support for public
transportation, schools and day care, all of which would reflect a change
in how the population shares in the economy. We must put our eyes on a new
prize: doing better in the Health Olympics. The best prescription for
health is not one we will get from doctors.
Bezruchka teaches at the University of Washingtons School of Public
Health.
copyright 2001 Newsweek, Inc.
Our Web Sites have information and reports from all of our Quality of Life
Projects!
http://www.utoronto.ca/qol http://www.utoronto.ca/seniors
*************************************************************
In the early hours I read in the paper of epoch-making projects
On the part of pope and sovereigns, bankers and oil barons.
With my other eye I watch
The pot with the water for my tea
The way it clouds and starts to bubble and clears again
And overflowing the pot quenches the fire.
-- Bertolt Brecht
**************************************************************
Dennis Raphael, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Public Health Sciences
Graduate Department of Community Health
University of Toronto
McMurrich Building, Room 308
Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5S 1A8
voice: (416) 978-7567
fax: (416) 978-2087
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
|
