SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Denis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:21:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Quoting Tom Carson <[log in to unmask]>:

> And the NDP in Saskatchewan closed more hospitals than anybody in the west
> had the nerve to.

Sometimes hospitals need to be closed or reorganized. What was the process? Was
it as thoroughly undemocratic as in Ontario? And did they disproportionately
target hospitals that serviced already marginalized populations (like Wellesley
and Women's in Toronto)?

> And as one who worked for 31 years as a civil servant with NDP and
> Conservative governments sometimes it's brutally difficult to see the
> difference.

The Conservative Party in Saskatchewan appears to be a different creature than
the Harper or Harris Conservatives - more in the "red Tory" tradition than the
socially conservative, economically neo-liberal one. Similarly, the
Conservatives in Sweden and Norway have more in common with the Social
Democrats there than with, say, Harper or Bush conservatives. This is probably
due to the historical influence of left-wing parties, voters, and civic
associations in shaping the respective political landscapes. So it's not
surprising that the differences are more subtle in Saskatchewan.

> A deeper public understanding will help more than a focus on political
> parties.

Agreed. But my initial posting was in response to what I perceved as an attack
on a particular party (and its leader) that appears to be more committed to the
SDOH than any other (even if they don't clearly articulate it). So rather than
throw bricks at them, let's focus on fostering a deeper public understanding
and remind ourselves to think about the SDOH when casting our votes.

Quoting Michael MacDonald <[log in to unmask]>:

> I agree with the idea that the parties won't act until there's a paradigm
> shift.  However, the paradigm shift cannot be solely the responsibility of
> any one party or politician.  It needs to be a societal thing.  The voters
> themselves need to be aware of these trends that are being identified
> through the research in SDOH.  Without this awareness in the community -
> there'll be no demand for change.

I hope this happens too.

Jeff

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2