Greetings:

As someone that has been involved with breast health for over 30 years,
the inclusion of MRI as an adjunct to breast screening is quite
interesting.

I agree, this would not be a problem for those with resources.  What
about the "yet to be reached", and those that are un/underinsured?

This probably would be something that funding agencies may/maynot
include as criteria for organizations that are requesting funding.

I add more attention to this issue (especially the cost factor), I will
be contacting the national breast cancer organizations.  Part of my
discussion will be to add MRI as one of the criteria for funding, based
on the studies.

Finally, if an MRI can detect the cancer earlier I am for it no matter
what the socio-economic status is.  Will continue to identify resources
that addresses these issues especially for vulnerable populations.

All for now.

STAY WELL, STAY FOCUSED, BE BLESSED!

Warmly,

Selma Morris
Breast Health Liaison
Grady Health System
International Health Advisor

>>> "Robert C Bowman" <[log in to unmask]> 03/29/07 9:47 AM >>>
Currently medical studies have identified Magnetic Resonance Imaging as
a
better test than mammograms for the detection of breast cancer. Under
new
guidelines, women at higher risk for breast cancer should obtain an
MRI. Of
course the nation is hardly ready for this good news.

The price tag for this will not be small. About 1.5 million women are
impacted. If the test becomes more common, you can bet that there will
be
additional women who will manage to gain the extra security of an MRI
rather than a mammogram. The guidelines for MRI include two close
relatives
with breast cancer. This will be a difficult concept. With even 1
close
relative, women will be demanding MRIs. This will mean a much larger
group
than just 1.5 million. Then there will be the liability pressures… 
Who
will want to take the chance that some lawyer will not find a second
family
member years later or other reasons why the test should have been
done.

Now the bar has been set even higher. Any woman with breast cancer
will
expect total diagnosis and early treatment and cure.

For practical purposes in estimating the costs we will stay with the
original 1.5 million scans a year costing $2,000 each. The hope is
that
40,000 lives will be saved, although as with most such estimates, this
is
difficult to determine. This is 3 billion dollars a year in new and
unanticipated health expenditures. All that prevents this is insurance
changes almost certain to be enacted, given the strong lobby for
women's
health fueled by our national intentions to attempt to live forever
and
most damaging our children and their children who may not have much of
a
chance in this scenario.

The winners and losers

The possible 40,000 women saved and their families are the possible
winners. Of course those who are in certain states, lower income
groups,
and middle income groups will not have the same health care coverage
and
the same access, they will pay more out of pocket that they do not
have, as
with all of their health care in the nation. You can bet that the
10,000
from the top quartile will be saved, but variable success will involve
the
30,000 from the middle and lower income quartiles. This does not
prevent
the use of the entire 40,000 in the deliberations at hand however.

How many would have actually been saved will never be known as we
rarely do
large scale studies with implementation. We move right from the
smallest
scale to the largest in such matters.

The MRI companies will be the big winners as well as the corporations
who
market and sell such equipment and that promote their use.

Initially radiologists will benefit, but I have some fears about their
discipline. This may be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Much
of
radiology has become automated and digitized. It is entirely possible
that
MRI reads will become very competiti
ve. Radiologists anywhere in the
world
can read them. Medical students are very aware of the vulnerable nature
of
radiology, and already move to interventional radiology, a portion of
the
discipline less amenable to global competition.

Much of the cost of the MRI is the physician cost of reading, and the
appropriate support and technology could reduce this to a few hundred
dollars. The pressures to reduce these new costs will be enormous.
Then
there is the liability increase for all in the entire pathway
involving
breast cancer screening and evaluation and failure to diagnose, the
most
common cause of liability suits.

This will also potentially highlight a number of massive increases in
medical costs where technology has technically reduced the actual costs
and
increased productivity, but each year the patient pays even more.

This may also be a dramatic illustration of how much specialists make
as
compared to the physicians that actually work with their patients
directly.
Reforms in this area are long overdue and the nation has basically
compromised all primary care in this delay. This is a minority
probability
however.

Each year for decades more and more funding has been shifted to
procedures,
technology, major medical centers, and specialists. The basic forms of
primary care are being compromised. The debates over Gardasil
immunizations
also highlight the problem. While some are hung up over a forced
immunization or sexuality issues, a major issue not fully discussed is
adding new and major health care costs to the nation.

Few comprehend the steady, subtle changes in the landscape of our
nation.
Increased health care costs already dominate state budgets, business
profitability, and even the jobs of teachers. Schools and education
lose
two ways. State budgets continue to include more for health and
education
and other areas face more difficulties. Also school district budget
officers are forced to make major cuts to provide health care coverage.
The
major item cut is school teachers, a major part of the budget and the
most
important part. The nation can ill afford to cut teaching and disable
business, especially the heart of the American economy, small
business.

Robert C. Bowman, M.D.
[log in to unmask] 

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask] 


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header --  to [log in to unmask] 

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask] 
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if
relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] 
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html 



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

This message has been scanned for viruses and spam by SurfControl RiskFilter - E-mail.

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html