TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Scott Holmes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:38:44 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
I mentioned a while back that I was reading Mark Twain The Fate of Humor
by James M. Cox, in fits and starts during my lunch break at work.  I
was a bit surprised to read that he'd considered The Prince and the
Pauper to be a failure.  Rather strong words.  I grant that it is not up
to par with the likes of Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, but then few
books are. I was wondering if this is the prevailing consensus among
Twain scholars.  I've just started a series of readings from this novel
as Second Life events, the virtual world on the internet.  I must admit
that Twain's attempts to duplicate speech patterns from the court of
King Henry VIII are awkward, a skill he was a master of with the
dialects along the Mississippi River.

Just curious....

ATOM RSS1 RSS2