TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:15:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Even if MT was wrong on the Shakespeare debate, his argument is persuasive
and hilarious.

Michel L. Stone
STONE & SUTTON, P.A.
116 East 4th Street
Panama City, Florida 32401
(850) 785-7272
[log in to unmask]

Mark Twain Interruption:
http://www.stageplays.com/products/mark_twain_interruptioncategorycyberpress
code417


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Twain Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan Walker
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Shakespeare

To be fair to the Oxfordians (and I have no position on this), what they wi=
ll say is that Oxford's extant poems were written when he was very young. J=
oe Sobran, for ex, points out that Titus Andronicus is so inferior to late =
works like The Tempest that it was hard to believe Shakespeare wrote it. An=
d as I recall, young Twain's "The Gallant Fireman" (if I'm remembering it c=
orrectly) didn't show a lot of promise, either, till you realize how young =
he was. Of course, it can work the other way, too, especially with poetry: =
I look at some of my earlier poem and think: wow, how come I can't write li=
ke that now?
Dan Walker


-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Bush <[log in to unmask]>
To: TWAIN-L <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:03 am
Subject: Re: Shakespeare


thanks Sean; that's a great point.  early conspiracy theory at its most
laughable!  -hb


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Sean Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dar Hal:
>
> Condolences.  I was very curious about this odd idea that Oxford wrote
> Shakespeare and did some reading into this area at one point.   The thing
> that really made me laugh - literally - was reading some of the poetry 
> attributed to the Earl of Oxford (you can find this on the pro-Oxford 
> sit=
es
> so they don't deny the earl wrote it).  Part way through the third 
> poem I could not stop laughing.  People think this amateur wrote the 
> works of Shakespeare?  Of course the Oxford supporters will claim the 
> earl wrote that mediocre poetry so no one would guess he was the 
> genius behind the poetry of Shakespeare - because no self-respecting 
> aristocrat would like to be know=
n
> as a literary genius.  They'd much rather be known as a barely 
> competent dabbler.
>
> Best,
>
> Sean Russell
>



--=20
Prof. Harold K. Bush
Professor of English
3800 Lindell
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO  63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>

=20

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2