Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:05:38 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Graeme's assessment. What struck me first when I read the
original post was the focus on individuals, their families, or specific
groups. There appeared to be no recognition of policy's impacts on
populations or a concern to address them. --Ocean
----------
Graeme wrote:
Ensuring that resources are made available is one thing, but this
outline smacks of totalitarianism. This entire document appears
predicated upon the notion of intensive social control.
And WTF is this 'intolerance for poor performance' business - this rings
very loud alarm bells. Exactly whose performance are we referring to
here? Who will be establishing - and potentially enforcing - these
standards? And who defines what a 'chaotic' life is? And why does this
'action plan' make the assumption poor people are personally responsible
for their own exclusion?
What this document spells out is a cradle-to-grave continuum of
aggressive controls specifically targeting lower-income groups.
-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]
To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header -- to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH
DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.
To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname
To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.
For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]
To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST
To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html
|
|
|