SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Breen, Nancy (NIH/NCI) [E]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:07:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
Possible.  But more likely the cash economy expanded and cash income
rose as a result for this group.  That cash incomes rose doesn't mean
the standard of living rose if compared to some socially
necessary/desirable/basic budget level.  Gross indicators like the WDI
are OK for comparisons across countries (though there's a literature
debating this), but provide inadequate detail to know whether the group
in question is more or less destitute than before.  I hope this helps.
It would be a good research project if you are inclined.

Cheers,
Nancy


-----Original Message-----
From: Rahul Mediratta [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Easing global poverty

The Toronto Star published an Editorial that states:
"Spectacular
growth in China has driven down the number of people in extreme poverty
to under 1 billion, from 1.5 billion 15 years ago, according to the
bank's World Development Indicators, 2007. "

Do you think it's possible that the World Bank lowered the poverty line
to shift a good chunk of the global destitute out of the world's focus?
The article can be accessed at:
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/article/204687
 


Rahul Mediratta
BHS Honours, Health Policy 
http://winstoninwonderland.blogspot.com





      Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at
http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2