TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (1.0)
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:48:36 -0500
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Alan Kitty <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Comments:
To: Clay Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I've seen him in the makeup. Looks good -- Theatrically, anyway. Heard his impersonation as well. The movie crept in, and out, without fanfare. Now I guess we know why.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 2, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Clay Shannon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Val Kilmer's 2013 movie, "Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn" is a train wreck=
> and a travesty. Don't waste your time, unless you enjoy the feeling of bei=
> ng sick at your stomach. If Val Kilmer's intent was to portray Twain as an =
> evil idiot, he succeeded. I wanted to not just yell at the tv, but also chu=
> nk a hunk of lead at it. The story is a weird kaleidoscopic, topsy-turvy am=
> algamation of Twain tales; Kilmer looks creepy in his zombie-esque makeup, =
> and the other actors (who are obviously amateurs) speak English with Europe=
> an accents (it was filmed in Bulgaria, so I assume they are Bulgarians).
> 
> Other than that, it's not too bad. I gave it one star on netflix, which is =
> the overall rating it has; was I the only one to rate it? Was I the only pe=
> rson to see it (besides my long-suffering wife)? I gave it one star because=
> it's not possible to give it zero stars - or negative 44, which is how I'd=
> really like to appraise it.=C2=A0- B. Clay Shannon

ATOM RSS1 RSS2