TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Arianela ." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:15:24 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Thanks for showing that the Library of Congress is making an effort
to deal with this production.  I won't take the time to compare the two
collections of errors we now can see, but I hope they took in all that
was originally presented in this Forum.
Arianne Laidlaw

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Peter Salwen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> That is discouraging, but Twain didn't have much use for critics, did he
> ("the most degraded of all trades")?
>
> For anyone who's interested, by the way, you can find a bunch of
> *additional* errors & omissions on the LOC's own errata sheet, which is
> online at
> http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2015/Files/TwainErrataSheet-Feb11-2015.pdf.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Arianela . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I hope that is so.  I notice the Amazon notice says that they are out
>> of stock, but I was also disappointed to see some favorable reviews.
>> Sigh
>> Arianne Laidlaw
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Barbara Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> > Arianne,
>> >
>> > To the best of my knowledge, the book was pulled from shipping and
>> > further publication shortly after the problems were first acknowledged
>> and
>> > has never been rereleased.
>> >
>> > Barb
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Arianne Laidlaw A '58
>>



-- 
Arianne Laidlaw A '58

ATOM RSS1 RSS2