TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
L T Oggel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:46:38 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Thanks. Pete.

Welland's good argument in the *NYPL* article (1965) that Pete refers to is
contained in Welland's later book, *Mark Twain in England* (1978),
published by...... you guessed it, Chatto (which had become Chatto and
Windus by then).

Terry

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Peter Messent <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dennis Welland's very careful essay on the differences between the two
> versions of the text was published in 'Mark Twain's Last Travel Book,'
> Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 69:1 (January 1965) pp. 31-48. I
> think I am right in saying that there is no evidence that Twain was aware
> that there were two different versions of the text. If I remember rightly,
> there's more on the British colonial material (South Africa especially) in
> the Chatto version. That is, though, a big if! Best. Pete This message and
> any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain
> confidential information. If you have received this message in error,
> please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use,
> copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
> legislation.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2