CLICK4HP Archives

Health Promotion on the Internet

CLICK4HP@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dennis Raphael <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Health Promotion on the Internet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 11:13:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (94 lines)
---------------------- Forwarded by Dennis Raphael/Atkinson on 08/01/2001 11:16
AM ---------------------------





"Montgomery, Laura E." <[log in to unmask]> on 08/01/2001 10:21:40 AM













 http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/31/national/31WELF.html?pagewanted=print
 JUL 31, 2001

 Surprising Result in Welfare-to-Work Studies

 By TAMAR LEWIN

 Early studies of families in three welfare-to-work programs have
found unexpected evidence that their adolescent children have lower
academic achievement and more behavioral problems than the children
of other welfare households.

"The findings are so surprising that they should wake us up and make
us think more about what's happening to adolescents," said Martha
Zaslow, one author of the study, issued by Child Trends, a nonpartisan
Washington research center.

"Most of the research, and the concerns, have been about how young
children's lives would change with welfare-to-work, how their daily
care would be different," Ms. Zaslow said. "The early studies have
found positive impact on young children, especially in certain
subgroups.  But the effects for adolescents were negative in all
three of these studies. There were no positive findings."

The data, gathered for Child Trends by the Manpower Demonstration
Research Corporation, researchers specializing in social policies
that affect low-income people, came from welfare-to-work programs
in Florida, Minnesota and Canada, all of which were precursors to the
federal welfare overhaul. In each of the studies, hundreds of
adolescents whose parents had been enrolled in a welfare-to-work
program for three or four years were compared with a control group
of young people in welfare households where the parents were not in
such a program.

In all three places, the adolescents with families in the programs
did worse in school than those in the control group, on measures like
performing at grade level.

In Florida, 40.7 percent of these 13-to-17-year-olds had been
suspended from school, as against only 32.7 percent of the control
group. Among adolescents in mother-headed households that had been on
welfare for only a short time when the program began, there was also
an increased likelihood of arrests, convictions and other involvement
with the police.


We welcome posting on social justice & public health that provide:
a) information (e.g. about conferences or job announcements or
publications relevant to social justice & public health), and
b) substantive queries or comments directly addressing issues
relevant to social justice and public health.

Please do NOT post petitions on the bulletin board, as they clog up
the works; instead, if you have a petition you want to circulate,
please post a notice about the petition and provide your email
address so people can email you to get a copy of the petition. Also,
to limit e-mail volume, please do not send posts directed toward a
single individual to the list at large. Instead of hitting 'reply',
cut and paste the person's address into the 'to' field, and send your
message directly to the her/him.

Community email addresses:
  Post message: [log in to unmask]
  Subscribe:    [log in to unmask]
  Unsubscribe:  [log in to unmask]
  List owner:   [log in to unmask]

To subscribe or un-subscribe send an e-mail to the address
specified above with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe"
in the subject line.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2