SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date:
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:00:07 -0800
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Diana Liw <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
I think that one of the main reasons that the US is behind many of the
developed countries in terms of its health outcomes is that fact even in
the 21st century, it still does not have universal health as a nation. 
In the past 100 years, the main focus has been in advancing medical
research particularly in the technology.  However, it's in the very
rudimentary stage to begin consider health in a mult-faced approach. 
It's been talked about how all disciplines need to work together, but it
was never fully implemented.  Just consider the lead positions of CDC,
NIH, and etc, most of them are physicians.  Many of them do advocate for
incorporating the social determinants of health, but rarely have any
ideas of how to put them into action, or even how to work with other
disciplines.  Just within the last ten to twenty years, US began to take
a grassroot approach (involving the communities) instead of tree top. 
However, old habits are hard to break.  There is still much tension
between community/grassroots organizatons and the "institutions".  Other
countries seem to be more advanced in this respect.  I see that we still
have a long way to go.  It needs an entire cultural change and paradigm
shift of how the health field do business.  I hate to use cliche, but
it's about working as team and that no single field or individual is
"superior" than the other.   It's doable, but we all need to have an
open mind about this.  In any case, these are definitely not critisms
but observations over time.

>>> [log in to unmask] 11/20/06 7:34 AM >>>
from  [log in to unmask] 
cc: 

Subject:        Re: Health status of America 2006 report

Hello Badri,

While the US has invested considerable sums in "bioterrorism" in the
past few years and this resulted in dollars invested in public health,
and while
the four areas mentioned -- "public health programmes, research,
health
care and health education" -- are indeed longtime priorities of the
CDC,
I would
not be overly optimistic about US health equity.

For starters, the US life expectancy has dropped to 30th in the latest
global health rankings, just below Cuba.  Also, if you read further in
the
2006 report, you will see that the summary of the Overall Health of
the
Nation notes advances in such areas as "emphasizing healthy lifestyle"
and "medication, medical technology...procedures, new prescription
drugs" while also noting that in some areas, progress "has not been as
rapid as in earlier years or trends have been moving in the wrong
direction.  Moreover, improvements have not been equally distributed
by
income, race, ethnicity, education or geography." 

In short, health inequalities and health inequities in the US are
growing in the twenty-first century. In other words, in my view its
rhetoric not reality.

I look forward to hearing from others in the US about their views of
this report. 

Barbara

Barbara Kivimae Krimgold
Director
Kellogg Health Scholars Program, Multidisciplinary Track

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask] 


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header --  to [log in to unmask] 
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask] 
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if
relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] 
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2