I couldn't agree with your statement more Christine.  Ironic, isn't it? 
You would think that the US would be at the cutting edge and forefront
of primary prevention, but we quite often have to learn from the
developing countries.  As you may be alluding in your email, money and
power if not used properly, corrupt!  However, I do see that need for
primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.  All levels of preventions
are needed to keep our communities healthy.  The question is how much
efforts/resources one spends with each.  One would hope that greater
proportion of resources should go into primary prevention.  This is not
of course the case in US.  Public Health, not until the Bioterriorism
came along, did it receive the attention and money that's needed.  That
in itself is quite unfortunate as one observes how money is being spent
where other "public health programs" are struggling.

As Richard said in an earlier email, we are still struggling with the
"systemic approach".  I see that we are making progress though.   It
needs more advocacy, but more than that everyone of us who advocate for
such needs, to try to change how we as individual work in our systems.

>>> [log in to unmask] 11/20/06 11:06 AM >>>
There is a major difference in the US compare to how it is understood
and pursued in developing countries for example. In resource poor
countries where I have worked, public health means primary prevention.
That is prevention to avoid sickness before it strike if possible ---
helping healthy people to stay healthy. Here in the US, apart from
immunization, we focus mostly on managing sicknesses. Our concept of
public health implies case management. There is no doubt that we need
to
take care of those who are sick. But we also need to understand that,
by
the time someone is sick, the train has already left the station. Most
people can avoid becoming sick and they want to if they have
opportunities to make healthy choices. 

To illustrate, during my HIV related work in Sub Saharan African
countries I found that HIV prevention rather than treatment of HIV as
important as it maybe, was at the top of the list in national health
policy. I learned that this focus was due to the fact that treatment
was
for the most part out of their means and unsustainable, and
unrealistic
given other competing health care needs. Equally importantly for them
is
their belief that HIV can and should be preventable. The key question
for research was why is it that some people who are living in similar
conditions are able to take action to reduce their HIV risk while
others
cannot. The fact that, most of international research interest and
support is now focusing on treatment not only distract program
partners
in the South from their own national priorities but also weakens their
health system. In a way we have been trying to sell our medication
approach to public health to these countries in stead of helping them
to
build health care systems that can work for them. 

Lack of interest in primary prevention in the US is quite disturbing
to
say the least. Over the years we have talked and discuss evidence
about
the growing problem of obesity. It does not require rocket science to
see why we are having problems with obesity here. Yet, a lot of money
has been spent to provide evidence on the nature and extent of the
problem. Even more money is been spent to technical solutions to help
people lose weight. And of course a whole industry is flourishing
selling diet this and diet that. One wonders, what happens to good old
physical exercise, like taking a walk with ones friends, children,
family, a dog etc? Working in the yard or gardening when the weather
is
good? It is taking many years to just to improve the quality of food
available to kids in public schools and so far I am still to hear of
any
policy decision on this regard. Is it true that a major surgical
operation a better way to deal with the problem? 

My feeling is that, when it comes to public health we know what needs
to
be done. Even though some of the determinants of health are complex,
understanding some of the key factors is a matter of common sense. The
real problem is whether an intervention makes money. One does not make
money by educating people on how to organize their lives in ways that
reduces diabetes risks, but rather by treating people who has
diabetic.
If a way could be found of turning a good profit through primary
prevention, there will be a lot of interest. This to me is the
critical
issue and very depressing indeed. I hope that someone will tell me
that
I am wrong.     

Christine.


DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it may be privileged,
confidential, and contain health information that is legally protected.
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above. The authorized recipient of this information is
prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless
permitted to do so by law or regulation. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying, or
distribution, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange
for the return or destruction of these documents.

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask] 


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT
the subject header --  to [log in to unmask] 
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO
THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask] 
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if
relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask] 

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to
[log in to unmask] 
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html