Please remove me from your list serve.  Too many emails to manage, the
exchange is great but volume is heavy!
Thank you
Pamela Hamel

-----Original Message-----
From: Social Determinants of Health [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Dennis Raphael
Sent: March 18, 2006 9:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SDOH] Toronto Star Editorial on Poverty


http://tinyurl.com/nbqvt

Turn attention to Ontario's poor
Mar. 18, 2006. 01:00 AM


Ontarians spend $1.2 billion a year feeding and taking care of their
pets.

Given that huge sum, just how much value do you think Ontario residents
place on the 660,000 men, women and children who are dependent on them
for
social assistance? The answer is that Ontarians spend just over three
times
as much on welfare benefits as they do on their pets. That comes to a
monthly average of just about $540 per recipient for food, shelter,
clothing and all the other necessities of life.

That figure is disgraceful - especially when one-third of all welfare
recipients are children, and another third are disabled adults.

Has the province forgotten the sense of compassion and caring that long
defined it before the former Conservative government of premier Mike
Harris
slashed welfare benefits by 22 per cent some 11 years ago to pay for big
tax cuts? The answer will come Thursday in the budget that Premier
Dalton
McGuinty's government tables at Queen's Park.

In a bid to remind McGuinty that the plight of Ontario's poorest
citizens
has actually worsened since he came to power, advocacy groups, including
the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, the Canadian Auto Workers and the
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, took to the streets Wednesday
in
a Hunger March, demanding an increase in social assistance. They want
benefits raised by 40 per cent to make up for the 1995 cuts and the
inflation that has eaten into welfare cheques since then.

The advocates claimed an increase of that magnitude is justified because
after paying rent and utilities, some welfare recipients had as little
as
35 cents a day to feed and clothe themselves.

The poor had the right to hold their peaceful protest. They also should
have the right not to go hungry, as many of them now do. Underscoring
the
inadequacy of social assistance, All Saints Church drop-in co-ordinator
Brian Buckle stresses what everyone on welfare already knows: "In the
City
of Toronto, you can't be on welfare and pay rent and buy food."

Joining the growing chorus of those who believe McGuinty can do better,
the
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives this week released a pre-budget
report urging the premier to stop ignoring the needy. Pointing to a huge
windfall in corporate taxes the government didn't expect, the centre
says
the government has run out of excuses for leaving the poor behind.

While Finance Minister Dwight Duncan may not have all the money he would
require to undo all the harm inflicted on welfare recipients over the
past
11 years, he will unquestionably have the money he would need to reverse
most of the Conservatives' original 22 per cent cut in benefits.

Although McGuinty has worked hard to repair the damage the Conservatives
did to health care and education, he has done little to address the
pressing needs of Ontario's most vulnerable people. He hasn't even
entirely
reversed the Tories' deplorable policy of depriving children on welfare
of
the money Ottawa provides for poor and middle-income children.

The time has come for McGuinty to declare his government represents the
interests of all Ontarians, even those who are without a strong voice.

In Thursday's budget, the premier needs to let his voice speak for the
disabled, for the province's poorest children and for their parents who
go
without so their children can eat. He needs to tell them that his
government will give them the assistance required to make sure they at
least have food on the table and a decent place to live.

"The information in this e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named, and is confidential.  Any other distribution, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please reply by e-mail to the sender and delete or destroy all copies of this message.  Ce courriel et toutes pièces-jointes sont transmises à titre confidentiel et ne sont destinés qu'à la personne ou à l'entité à qui ils sont adressés et pourraient bénéficier du secret professionnel.   Un tel privilège est réclamé de façon expresse.  Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur vous êtes prié de contacter l'auteur immédiatement et d'effacer la version originale ainsi que toutes pièces-jointes.  Veuillez ne pas diffuser, distribuer ou copier."

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html