SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robert C Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:59:35 -0600
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
When doing studies on the United States, I find it useful to use the
concept of "caring for children" rather than welfare state.
      In education
      In health care coverage

The words "welfare states" conjure up different images.

The real problems seem to me to be concentrations of wealth, health, and
income and concentrations of poverty, ignorance, and poor health.

Neither extreme functions efficiently. One because of poor education and
the other because of the need to rigidly structure existence to maintain
great wealth or restructure entire systems in inefficent ways to maintain
failing wealth.

The failure of conservative types and high income is that they fail to see
the additional costs of such structures and the threat of complete systems
breakdown until too late.

The failure of liberal types is in use of support and funding in the most
efficient and earliest and most invasive types of interventions and the sad
tendency of "programs" to reduce public involvement and participation and
effectiveness.

The breadth of income and education states do have better investment in
children in health and education, but in the broadest and earliest
categories. This tends to show up in high school graduation rate more than
college graduates.

The depth of income and education states tend to ignore children and focus
on the highest areas of higher education and investments in education after
low income types have dropped out, mainly because they never received much
investment as children. They often have higher college graduation rates,
but many have been recruited from other states and nations.

The so called "Welfare States" tend to be independent and support the
states who are, in reality, the most dependent.

Robert C. Bowman, M.D.
[log in to unmask]

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2