SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dennis Raphael <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:52:22 -0400
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask], Cdn Science Writers' Assn <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (156 lines)
http://nytimes.com/2004/08/10/business/10auto.html?pagewanted=print&position=

August 10, 2004
U.S. Regulators Release Vehicle Rollover Data
By DANNY HAKIM

For the first time, federal regulators released figures yesterday that show
how prone individual models of new cars and light-duty trucks are to roll
over in an accident, exposing the occupants to high risk of death or
serious injury.

Instead of merely assigning a star rating to each model it tests, as it has
done in the past, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
released figures that allow consumers to compare rollover risk model by
model. The star system, which is continuing, has been criticized for not
providing enough information to distinguish among vehicles, because nearly
all received three or four stars.

Of the 68 models the agency tested for the 2004 model year, the Ford
Explorer Sport Trac, a cross between a pickup and a sport utility vehicle,
was found to have the highest rollover risk. The agency's tests indicated a
35 percent chance of rolling over during a single-vehicle accident.

That is more than four times the risk of the best performer in this year's
tests, a four-door Mazda RX-8 sedan, which was about 8 percent, the agency
said. Mazda is an affiliate of the Ford Motor Company, which makes the
Explorer.

As expected, cars performed much better than S.U.V.'s or pickup trucks in
the tests, because cars are not as tall and generally ride closer to the
ground, making them more stable. But the new ratings also show wide
differences among vehicles of the same type.

For instance, versions of the Chevrolet Silverado pickup, made by General
Motors, were judged to have a 16 percent to 18.5 percent risk of rollover,
while one version of the Tacoma pickup from Toyota was rated as high as
28.3 percent.

"This is a problem that continues to produce about a third of our occupant
fatalities every year, even though they are less than 3 percent of our
crashes," Dr. Jeffrey W. Runge, the administrator of the traffic safety
agency, said of rollovers. The new rankings information, he said, "does arm
the consumer with a little more sophisticated information."

Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers, an industry lobbying group, said it was difficult to rate an
automobile "like you rate a movie."

"This is just one rating," she said. "We urge people to look at all
information and make a judgment, including the front impact and the side
impact ratings."

The new rollover rankings, along with front and side impact test ratings,
are available at the safety agency's Web site, www.safercar.gov.

The agency also reported that the Ford Escape S.U.V. tipped up on two
wheels during a rollover test; it was found to have a rollover risk of 21
percent to 24 percent - the same risk assigned to its corporate twin, the
Mazda Tribute, which the agency did not test but which is essentially the
same vehicle.

Kristin Kinley, a spokeswoman for Ford, said, "While we believe the
N.H.T.S.A. rating system has some value, we don't think it's the most
effective indicator of how vehicles perform in the real world."

Consumer groups have said the agency needs to do more to make the ratings
available to the public.

"We compliment the agency on improving its presentation," said Joan
Claybrook, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen. But
"significant flaws remain," she said, noting that the information was still
not very easy to find. She said the agency should also establish a minimum
performance threshold for rollover risk.

While the Explorer Sport Trac was the worst performer overall, the 2004
Subaru Outback wagon was the worst performer among passenger cars, a
category that includes sedans and station wagons, with a 15.5 percent
rollover risk. Other vehicles that combine aspects of wagons and S.U.V.'s,
like the Nissan Murano, performed similarly, though some were counted as
light-duty trucks; one, the Chrysler Pacifica from DaimlerChrysler, was
ranked as the best performer in the S.U.V. group, with a 13 percent to 14
percent risk.

Rollover accidents kill more than 10,000 Americans a year, and have become
a major traffic safety issue because of the popularity of sport utility
vehicles and large pickup trucks. Drunken driving and failure to wear
seatbelts also contribute to the high death toll in rollovers, as they do
in other accidents.

While the high ground clearance of light-duty trucks can make drivers feel
more in control, it also raises the vehicles' center of gravity, making the
trucks easier to tip. Even so, manufacturers have powerful financial
incentives to sell S.U.V.'s and pickups, not least that those vehicles are
subject to considerably less stringent fuel economy regulations than cars.

Subaru, for instance, redesigned the Outback for the 2005 model year,
raising its ground clearance and making other changes, allowing it to
qualify for the lower truck standard. A Subaru executive said yesterday
that the company expects the 2005 Outback to do better in rollover tests
than the 2004 model, despite being taller, because other dimensions have
also been changed.

The four minivans tested by the agency were found to have rollover risks of
12 percent to 16 percent, at the high end of the car ratings but lower than
most light-duty trucks. Several S.U.V.'s. were rated above 25 percent,
including the Chevrolet Tahoe, the GMC Yukon, and some versions of the Ford
Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer.

The government rollover tests began this year at the direction of Congress,
which ordered the agency to develop a track test in the wake of a series of
fatal rollover crashes in the late 1990's involving Ford Explorers equipped
with Firestone tires.

In the new tests, vehicles are driven through as many as 10 fishhook
maneuvers, a jarring series of turns intended to replicate what happens
when drivers momentarily lose control and veer to overcompensate. Last
week, G.M. said it would recall its Saturn Vue S.U.V. because the vehicle's
suspension broke during the test.

Previously, the government assessed rollover risk based on the vehicle's
dimensions and a mathematical formula, without performing tests. Those
calculations remain at the heart of the agency's evaluations, with the new
track test information added.

Regulators are also looking into adding another test to assess handling,
with its own star rating. One reason is that manufacturers can make a
vehicle less prone to roll over in the tests by changing its tire
specifications in ways that also make it less maneuverable.

"The idea of the handling test is, you can achieve good rollover resistance
by degrading the handling of the vehicle, and that's not something we
want," said Garrick Forkenbrock, a research engineer at the traffic safety
agency. "It's no good if it's robbing Peter to pay Paul."

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: http://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2