SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Melissa Raven <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Melissa Raven <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:11:57 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
I agree, Marlene. Echoes of Muriel Schultz's classic 1975 paper, The 
semantic derogation of women, which discussed how, historically, many words 
about women have started off positive or neutral, but gathered negative 
connotations over time.
Welfare has such negative conntations, yet its literal meaning is so 
positive. If it can't escape the derogation, nothing will.
Melissa

Melissa Raven, Lecturer
Department of Public Health, Flinders University
GPO Box 2100, ADELAIDE  SA  5001
Physical address G5 Flats, Flinders Medical Centre, BEDFORD PARK
Phone  (08) 8204 5714   Fax  (08) 8204 5693   International 61 8

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marlene Rivier" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SDOH] Welfare states and health


It won't matter what term you adopt.  In time it will take on the same 
pejorative meaning.  People  who have intellectual limitations have been
variously said to suffer from mentally deficiency (moron, imbecile, idiot, 
etc.), mental retardation (retards), developmental disability.  Changing the
nomenclature every few years does nothing to address the overvaluing of 
intellect and the devaluing and marginalization of those with less of it in
our culture.

It is the underlying attitude or philosophical stance that is the problem 
and it will not change by virtue of adopting more neutral of even positively
toned language.  In time it will become pejorative because those who oppose 
the concept will it pervert as a matter of politics.

So maybe we just need to own it and define as we choose.

There is a lesson to be learned from any marginalized group that takes 
ownership of the vulgar language used to define and undermine them and in
doing so disempower the words.

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]
SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.
SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1000+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2