SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kenneth Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:35:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
I guess it's good that it was surprising enough to the author and to the editor of the ajph that they published it. 
But really. She must be feigning her shock. 

Ken Thompson MD
4127608483
Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 26, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Enrique Cardiel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> It is amazing the resistance to this knowledge. I've listened to many people much "better educated" than I argue that we need to focus on "universal health care" instead of social determinants. 
> 
> While increased access to medical services IS important as far as I can tell a just society would produce much more health. 
> 
> 
> Working Together for Healthy Communities!
> 
> Enrique Cardiel, MPH
> Urban Health Extension Coordinator, Facilitator IDHCC
> 505-925-7393
> "Health workers have an obligation to address the issue of poverty directly rather than remain content to deal with its effects." D Raphael
> 
> "Health promotion is the process of enabling people to increase control over, and to improve, their health." - Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
> 
> October is Health Literacy Month! http://www.healthliteracymonth.org/
> ________________________________________
> From: Social Determinants of Health [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goldberg, Daniel [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 11:50 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [SDOH] Low income linked to poorer health in US & England despite different health systems
> 
> I agree.  This part of the story utterly confused me.  I mean no disrespect to the investigator whatsoever, but how could these findings be surprising?
> 
> Whitehall I findings were published in 1978.  How could informed scholars today predict that access to health care services would significantly buffer the income-health relationship?
> 
> Daniel S. Goldberg, J.D., Ph.D
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Bioethics & Interdisciplinary Studies
> Brody School of Medicine
> East Carolina University
> 600 Moye Blvd, Mailstop 641
> Greenville, N.C. 27834
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.ecu.edu/cs-dhs/medhum/goldberg.cfm
> http://ecu.academia.edu/DanielGoldberg
> Twitter: @prof_goldberg<https://twitter.com/prof_goldberg>
> _______________
> Tel:  252.744.5699
> Fax: 252.744.2319
> 
> 
> 
> From: Social Determinants of Health [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dennis Raphael
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 1:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [SDOH] Low income linked to poorer health in US & England despite different health systems
> 
> The results surprised author Melissa Martinson<http://csde.washington.edu/people/interests.php?id=175>, an assistant professor at the UW’s School of Social Work, who expected income to have less of an effect on the health of English residents due to their access to publicly funded health care.
> 
> WOW THIS IS SHOCKING!  [THAT THIS PERSON IS SURPRISED BY THESE FINDINGS.]
> 
> Its not as if the Black report and the 25 following UK reports had been kept hidden!  :-)
> 
> dr
> 
> 
> To leave, manage or join list: https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1
> To leave, manage or join list: https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1
> 
> To leave, manage or join list: https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1

To leave, manage or join list: https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2