SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert C Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:54:35 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Companies like Union Pacific have different opinions. Granted they do keep
employees for 15 or 20 years compared to months or a few years for most,
but the company does realize gains from a wellness approach. They spend
$12000 per family of 3.2 (memory may be failing here though). They shape
health care in 30 states and deal with all the fun unions, population
groups, city, federal, and other regulations involved

They have a largely male population with high stress (controllers) to heavy
labor and often long hours. All employees are carefully monitored for
health and behavior as are all involved in transportation now. Diets and
smoking and diabetes and HBP are major areas. Anti-smoking campaigns
bordered on civil liberties violations in their pursuit.

The task is difficult. They also have providers in some areas that extort
them with much higher costs of care than they should be paying. UP will pay
this back by fewer jobs in the future, you can bet on this. Some medical
centers and towns never learn.

They are also rating providers in quality areas. This will be interesting,
but clearly is necessary. Whether this takes into account more of a cost
perspective or a quality perspective is unknown.

UP set up model programs involving a wide range of physical, mental,
emotional activities, changed the food types available, established various
discounts and incentives, and completely rebuilt their food services
(number 2 visited place by senior tour buses visiting Omaha, after the
world class zoo).

It is interesting what happens when systems can be planned over years
instead of months, and when long term over all costs are considered rather
than this month's bottom line.

Now should health care be in the hands of temporary employers that rarely
consider long term health, costs, or well being, or in other hands?

Robert C. Bowman, M.D.
[log in to unmask]

-------------------
Problems/Questions? Send it to Listserv owner: [log in to unmask]


To unsubscribe, send the following message in the text section -- NOT the subject header --  to [log in to unmask]

SIGNOFF SDOH

DO NOT SEND IT BY HITTING THE REPLY BUTTON. THIS SENDS THE MESSAGE TO THE ENTIRE LISTSERV AND STILL DOES NOT REMOVE YOU.

To subscribe to the SDOH list, send the following message to [log in to unmask] in the text section, NOT in the subject header.

SUBSCRIBE SDOH yourfirstname yourlastname

To post a message to all 1200+ subscribers, send it to [log in to unmask]
Include in the Subject, its content, and location and date, if relevant.

For a list of SDOH members, send a request to [log in to unmask]

To receive messages only once a day, send the following message to [log in to unmask]
SET SDOH DIGEST

To view the SDOH archives, go to: https://listserv.yorku.ca/archives/sdoh.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2