Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:58:49 -0800 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Organization: |
Corning Community College |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What an intriguing post (and so appropriate for a Twain list -- master
of dialogue/dialect)
When I teach literature to my community college students, I ALWAYS read
ALL poetry out loud to them -- and I can't tell you how many journal
entries I've read where the student says, "I just didn't get this poem
at all when I read it, but when you read it out loud in class, I
understood it/it made sense." Poetry, and especially Shakespeare, was
meant to be heard, not read (although many poems are visually
stimulating as well) and I think the same can be said for a lot of
literature (a.k.a. novels, short stories, essays), ESPECIALLY Twain.
After all, isn't it all about language and how the words sound
together? I know that even those students who are visual learners will
benefit from reading along and hearing the material.
Personally, I move my lips when I am reading something slowly that I
really want to understand and take notes about -- fiction is another
story. How awful to be told not to do that and take advantage of
connecting all the parts of our language -- verbal, auditory, written --
together.
Again, just my two cents.
Thanks!
Renee L. Gross
Corning Community College
|
|
|