CLICK4HP Archives

Health Promotion on the Internet

CLICK4HP@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Lawrence W. Green" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Health Promotion on the Internet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 May 1997 13:58:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (252 lines)
The following reports have been published recently by the National Academy
of Sciences (ordering information at end). They will be presented at a
special session at the American Public Health Association, Wednesday, Nov.
12 at 8:30 am. The session will be sponsored by the community health
section, and co-sponsored by the APHA Program Development Board. The
published reports themselves could be useful in health professions training
programs with the same learning objectives as those shown for each of the
APHA presentations.


SHARING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMUNITY'S HEALTH:  A SYNTHESIS OF NEW
  REPORTS FROM THE INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
  Michael A. Stoto, Ph.D.

  A syntheses of recently completed reports from the Institute of Medicine
  dealing with current some of the leading themes in public health today
  concludes that (1) the publics health depends on the interaction of many
  factors; thus, the health of a community is a shared responsibility of
  many entities, organizations, and interests in the community, including
  health service delivery organizations, public health agencies, other
  public and private entities, and the people of a community; (2) within
  this context of shared responsibility, specific entities should identify,
  and be held accountable for, the actions they can take to contribute
  toward the communitys health; (3) communities can use performance
  monitoring to promote collaboration and accountability in achieving
  health improvement goals,  (4) partnerships between public health
  agencies and managed care organizations for the delivery of personal and
  population-based health services and with public and private community
  organizations to deal with broader concerns to advance the health of the
  community will be critical for advancing the health of the public and of
  communities in the future; (5) society must reinvest in governmental
  public health agencies, with resources, commitments, and contributions
  from government, private, and non-profit sectors, and substantial legal
  authorities, if the publics health is to improve, (6) improved
  community-based data systems and tools for performance monitoring are
  needed, and (7) more community-based, practice oriented research is
  needed to identify strategies for communities to use to improve the
  health of their members.

  ______________________

  Learning Objectives

  1.   Participants will improve their understanding of the importance of
       community factors on health and the many entities that can influence
       a communitys health.

  2.   Participants will learn about new models for cooperation between
       public health agencies and other entities that can contribute to a
       communitys health.

  3.   Participants will learn about new tools such as performance
       monitoring applied to community health improvement.


 HEALTHY COMMUNITIES:  NEW PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC HEALTH
  Stuart Bondurant, M.D, Hugh H. Tilson, M.D, Dr.PH, Michael A. Stoto,
       Ph.D.

  Representing the work of the IOM Public Health Roundtable, this report
  reviews progress that has been made since the release of the IOMs The
  Future of Public Health and two critical areas:  (1) the relationship
  between public health agencies and the publics health and managed care
  and (2) the role of the public health agency in the community.  Healthy
  Communities concludes that the concepts in The Future of Public Health
  remain vital to efforts to energize and focus the efforts of the public
  health community, and that society must reinvest in governmental public
  health agencies, with resources, commitments, and contributions from
  government, private, and non-profit sectors, and substantial legal
  authorities, if the publics health is to improve.  The report reaffirms
  the understanding of public health professionals and health scientists
  that the publics health depends on the interaction of many factors; thus,
  the health of a community is a shared responsibility of many entities,
  organizations, and interests in the community, including health service
  delivery organizations, public health agencies, other public and private
  entities, and the people of a community.  Within this context of shared
  responsibility, specific entities should identify, and be held
  accountable for, the actions they can take to contribute toward the
  communitys health.   As a result of this understanding, the report
  focuses on how governmental public health agencies, especially at the
  state and local level, can develop partnerships with managed care
  organizations for the delivery of personal and population-based health
  services and with public and private community organizations to deal with
  broader concerns to advance the health of the community.  Developing
  these partnerships, the report says, will be critical for advancing the
  health of the public and of communities in the future.

  ______________________

  Learning Objectives

  1.   Participants will learn about new developments in public health
       since the publication of The Future of Public Health, especially
       with regard to  (1) the relationship between public health agencies
       and the publics health and managed care and (2) the role of the
       public health agency in the community.

  2.   Participants will learn about new models for cooperation between
       public health agencies, managed care organizations, and other
       entities that can contribute to a communitys health.

  3.   Participants will learn about partnerships between public health and
       other community agencies and their importance for community health
       improvement.



  IMPROVING HEALTH IN THE COMMUNITY: A ROLE FOR PERFORMANCE MONITORING
  Bobbie Berkowitz, Ph.D., R.N., Thomas Inui, M.D., Alan Cross, M.D., Jane
  Durch, M.A., Michael A. Stoto, Ph.D.

  This report from the IOM Committee on Using Performance Monitoring to
  Improve Community Health recommends that communities adopt a
  comprehensive approach to health improvement that forges new coalitions
  and systematically monitors the performance of the diverse elements that
  affect health.  Performance monitoring emerges as a tool that communities
  can use to promote collaboration and accountability in achieving health
  improvement goals.  Improving Health in the Community draws on lessons
  from a variety of current activities to outline the elements of a
  continuing, community-based health improvement process intended to be
  adapted locally to meet an individual community's circumstances,
  discusses the role that performance monitoring can play in this process,
  and proposes tools to help communities develop performance indicators.
  The report calls for the development of community health coalitions to
  oversee broad health assessment and priority-setting activities,
  including the creation of a community health profile that includes
  relevant information about local demographic and socioeconomic
  characteristics, health status, and health risks.  For addressing
  specific health concerns, performance monitoring is an important tool.
  Communities should carefully select indicators to measure the process and
  outcomes of health improvement efforts.  Data for these indicators should
  be made available to the public to gauge the effectiveness of the health
  improvement efforts and the contributions made by the many parties in the
  community--public health agencies, managed care organizations, schools,
  employers, and others--that could be expected to contribute.

  ______________________

  Learning Objectives

  1.   Participants will learn about new models for cooperation between
       public health agencies, managed care organizations, and other
       entities that can contribute to a communitys health.

  2.   Participants will learn about the use of performance monitoring for
       community health improvement.

  3.   Participants will learn about data systems and coalitions needed for
       community-based performance monitoring for health improvement.



  LINKING RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: A REVIEW OF CDCS PROGRAM OF
  CENTERS FOR RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE
  PREVENTION.
  Lawrence W. Green, Dr.P.H., Michael A. Stoto, Ph.D.

  This report by an IOM committee reviews a CDC program CDC as well as the
  community-based, practice oriented research that is needed to identify
  strategies for communities to use to improve the health of their members.
  The report concludes that the prevention research centers program has
  made substantial progress and commends the participants and the programs
  management for their contributions to health promotion and disease
  prevention, and proposes a set of recommendations intended to strengthen
  the quality and management of the program as it begins its second decade
  of work.  By strengthening the program, the prevention research centers
  can contribute even more to local, state, and national efforts to improve
  the health of Americans.  The report also presents a vision for public
  health and prevention research which may be of interest to academics in
  public health and preventive medicine.  In particular, the report
  suggests that researchers in health promotion and disease prevention to
  expand their activities to include (1) a focus on risk conditions and
  social determinants of health; (2) an orientation toward the community;
  (3) interdisciplinarity; (4) dissemination research in public health; (5)
  an interactive process for establishing research priorities; and (6) a
  role in setting national research priorities.

  ______________________

  Learning Objectives

  1.   Participants will understand the importance of community-based,
       practice oriented research for community health improvement.

  2.   Participants will understand the ways in which university-based
       research centers can collaborate as full partners in research and
       dissemination activities with the communities in which they are
       located.

  3.   Participants will learn about new community-based approaches to
       dissemination and dissemination research.

====================================================
The following additional report is not part of the APHA session, but
pertains to the same issues of community partnerships for health:

  SCHOOLS AND HEALTH: OUR NATIONS INVESTMENT Diane Allensworth et al.

  A new report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), Schools and Health:
  Our Nations Investment, proposes comprehensive school health programs
  (CSHP) as a means to address many health-related problems of our nation's
  children and youth.  CSHPs can take advantage of the pivotal position of
  to health-related services at the school site.

  The final report relates the history and background of school health
  programming in the United States and provides the committees findings and
  14 policy recommendations.  The recommendations are in the areas of
  health education; health services; research; and the local, state, and
  national infrastructure.

                         SYNOPSIS OF RECOMMENDATIONS

  Education. Health education in elementary and middle school and
  requirements for health education in high school are needed Preparation
  of teachers in health education content and methodology also is
  recommended.

  Services.  Planning and monitoring of school health services and all
  aspects of research on school-based services is needed. Issues related to
  confidentiality of student records and continuation of funding for
  schools in reaching children and families by combiningin an integrated,
  systematic mannerhealth education, health promotion and disease
  prevention, and access school health services are addressed.

  Infrastructure.  National policy coordination and the site for this
  coordination focus and relevant partnerships that need to be developed
  are presented. Needs for state and local coordination of efforts and
  training for personnel to provide this coordination and integration of
  efforts are recommended.

  Research and evaluation. Recommendations include the need to pursue
  critical knowledge gaps about comprehensive school health programs, and
  the need to launch and study model comprehensive school health programs
  in whole and in part.

  Overall the committee concluded that CSHPs must be locally tailored to
  meet each communitys unique needs, resources, perspectives, and
  standards.  The first step in establishing a CSHP is for the community to
  involve a wide range of stakeholdersparents, students, educators, health
  and social service personnel, insurers, business and political leadersin
  assessing community needs and resources and in establishing program
  goals.

 ===========================================================================

Copies of LINKING RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: A REVIEW OF CDC'S
PROGRAM OF CENTERS FOR RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND
DISEASE PREVENTION, or any of the other reports abstracted above, can be
ordered by calling the toll-free number of the National Academy Press
(1-800-624-6242) between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. EST, or 202-334-3313 in the
Washington, D.C. area, or through their Internet address: http://www.nap.edu

ATOM RSS1 RSS2