Ed,
Thanks for the advice. My information is based on 1200 years of research.
It is also based on my own experiences and the experiences of my family and
friends and their families and friends and so on. It is also based on the
experience of over 100,000 other people who report the same results.
Should we discount this information as being false or a lie? Are we all
making this up? I know for myself that what I have seen is beyond words and
nobody can ever change that. I know the information I have has saved quite
a few lives. All I want to do is help people, that's all. Is there
something wrong with that? What type of proof would one need? Do we ever
ask our doctors what is in the medications that we are prescribed? No. Do
we ever ask for proof from real people about what their experiences have
been with certain meds or treatments? Sometimes, but if it comes from a
doctor then no matter what answers we get, we will just go ahead and do it
because the doctor said so. Let me ask you a question. Do you think there
is any natural products out in the real world that may actually do something?
As for self-serving, how much do doctors get paid in relation to the actual
service they provide? I believe that is the definition of self-serving. If
I could give the stuff away, I would. But I cannot so everyone is on their
own. I just provide the information, what they do with it is up to them. I
am not trying to scam anyone here into doing anything. I just know what I
know and I feel everyone else is entitled to know about it and then decide
for themselves. The question is how do I do that without getting the wolves
that hide in the shadows attacking me. Any suggestions?
Brian
At 04:05 PM 10/22/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Brian,
>
>I think finding the correct forum is key. I write for newspapers and answer
>questions about nutrition, foods and health for consumers. My "output" is
driven
>by the questions thrown my way. As this list is associated with health
>promotion, it would seem appropriate for list members to discuss
health-related
>items.
>
>If your "information" is research based, and not based on any
>multi-level-marketing gimmick, I would say go ahead and have at it. But if
>your information was more in the line of a self-serving come-on I would
say keep
>it to yourself. There was another Brian Jerome that has posted messages
about
>"Parasites in the body and what it means!" Could this, by any chance,
be what
>you want to tell us? (If not, you have my apology.)
>
>Ed Blonz
>
>Brian Jerome wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I would like to introduce myself, my name is Brian Jerome and I been
>> reading your letters for a little while now and I was wondering about
>> something. This question may seem a little strange at first but bare
with me.
>>
>> If you had information that was really important to everyones health, and
>> could save tons of lives, would you just share that information or would
>> you wait till someone comes to you? The only problem I see with the latter
>> is no one would know you had information, therefore they could not ask.
>>
>> That is the place I find myself in. Everytime in the past that I try to
>> share what I know, people who almost seem like they are waiting for me to
>> do that, jump out and ridicule or complain. I am not forcing anyone to do
>> anything, I just want to share the information and then let everyone decide
>> on their own.
>>
>> What do you guys think? What would you do if you were in my position? I
>> would really appreciate some feedback or even advice. Thanks.
>>
>> Brian
>
>--
> Maintaining a positive attitude may not solve all your
> problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worthwhile.
> \\ // [log in to unmask]
> ( o o ) http://www.blonz.com/blonz
> ooo0---( _ )---0ooo
>
>
>
|
