CLICK4HP Archives

Health Promotion on the Internet

CLICK4HP@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Blake Poland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Health Promotion on the Internet (Discussion)
Date:
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 12:55:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (178 lines)
Hello All:

(1) in response to Debbie Monkman's inquiry about the use of the term
"community capacity" in Ontario, I offer a few comments:

  (a) the Ontario Ministry of Health has put
      out a number of documents of potential
      interest in this regard:
      "Capacities for Health Promotion" (n.d.)
      and "Capacity Building Resource Network -
      Discussion Draft" (revised Jan.'95)
      (personally, I don't find either of them
      particularly inspiring - capacities are
      defined mostly in 'social planning' terms
      as the abilities and skills of individuals
      and community groups to write grant
      proposals, do needs assessments, conduct
      project evaluations, etc)

  (b) David McKeown (AMOH, City of Toronto Public
      Department, July 1995) put out a document
      entitled "Indicators and Information Sources
      for Community Health Planning: A Resource
      Guide" which also describes the types of
      community resources one might wish to incl.
      in a community project planning exercise

  (c) the United Way of America last year issued
      a monograph entitled "United Ways' Community
      Capacity-Building Stories"

  (d) much of the discussion about "community capacity"
      and "community asset mapping" is directly
      inspired by John McKnight's lifelong work in
      this area, and in particular the book he wrote
      with Kretzman entitled: "Building Communities
      From the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding
      and Mobilizing A Community's Assets" (Center
      for Urban Affairs & Policy Research,
      Neighborhood Innovations Network, Northwestern
      University, Evanston IL, 1993)

  (e) a group of researchers at the University of
      Toronto (myself included), in collaboration
      with the Toronto-based Coalition Against
      Neighbourhoodism have been funded to do an
      empirical qualitative community-based study
      of community capacity working with a number
      of neighbourhoods in Toronto that are
      generally characterized as "disadvantaged".
      I've included the abstract from a paper
      recently delivered at a conference on
      "Defining Community, Re-examining Society"
      held in Flint MI 2 weeks ago.


Half Full or Half Empty?
An Empirical and Conceptual Basis for
Redefining Community Based on Capacities
Rather Than Deficits

August 27, 1996


Paper prepared for presentation at the Interdisciplinary Conference on
"Defining Community, Re-examining Society"

University of Michigan-Flint
Flint, Michigan
September 19-21, 1996




Suzanne F. Jackson, Ph.D.
        North York Community Health Promotion Research Unit

Shelley Cleverly, B.Sc.N., M.Sc. Candidate
        North York Community Health Promotion Research Unit

Blake Poland, Ph.D.
        Department of Behavioural Science, University of Toronto

Ann Robertson, Dr.P.H.
        Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Toronto

David Burman, D.D.S., D.D.P.H., Ph.D.
        Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto

Michael Goodstadt, Ph.D.
        Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto

Lisa Salsberg, B.A.
        Healthy City Office, City of Toronto


(under the auspices of the North York Community Health Promotion Research Unit)

ABSTRACT

When health and social workers come in to help communities, they have
usually focussed on the problems and difficulties that communities face.
The media also focus on problems because they are more dramatic than "good
news". The result is that communities are often labelled as "problem
communities" to the outside world. Even members of those communities think
of their own community in terms of its problems rather than thinking about
the successful ways that its people are dealing with the problems and
preventing them. In the extreme, such labelling of communities assumes the
form of "neighbourhoodism", revealing prejudices with thinly veiled racist
and classist overtones, which potentially contributes to the breakdown (as
opposed to strengthening) of community.

A group of university-based and public health researchers, as well as
community-based practitioners, have, in cooperation with the Coalition
Against Neighbourhoodism (formed in 1995 in response to repeated negative
press directed at specific neighbourhoods in Toronto, Canada), have
established a project to measure the positive actions that are being taken
in three areas of Metro Toronto so that everyone, including the people that
live there, will think of the communities in those areas in a more positive
light. We believe that these measures will be very helpful in giving
community and other agencies positive ways to see any neighborhood and
balancing the negative way neighborhoods/communities are often labelled.

Our working definition of community capacity emerges from a conceptual
model which focusses on the collective strengths and talents of people
within the community that help things work well (its capabilities) plus the
conditions outside the community, like the environment and the economy,
that influence how things work (which act as facilitating conditions or as
obstacles).

In this project we are seeking to understand community capacities and how
they might be measured by working with community members and community
workers. Our aim is to work together to:

(a) discover and describe the projects that communities are working on and
what determines their success

(b) examine the conditions in the larger context (social, political,
economic environments) that enable or thwart success

(c) understand the strengths and talents of communities

(d) develop measures of the positive capacities of communities


In this paper we present our conceptual framework, rationale, research
design, and preliminary data based on pilot work in three stigmatized
communities in Toronto, Canada.


--------ABOVE NOTE IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING POSTING (SEPT.30):
>
>Date:    Tue, 1 Oct 1996 12:12:00 -0400
>From:    Debbie Monkman <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: "Community capacity" in Ontario
>
>I wonder if someone might be able to comment on this. A researcher
>wants to know whether the term "community capacity" is being used in
>Ontario, and if so, how it is defined and how it is being used.
>Thank you for any help.
>
>Debbie Monkman ([log in to unmask])
>Head, Reference Services
>Addiction Research Foundation
>Toronto, ON
>

----------
Blake Poland, Ph.D.
Department of Behavioural Science
Faculty of Medicine, McMurrich Building
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario
Canada   M5S 1A8

tel: 416-978-7542; fax: 416-978-2087
email: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2