TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marcus W. Koechig" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Sep 1997 19:31:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 11:42 AM 9/3/97 -0700, Ms. Kathy Farretta wrote:

>this is an interesting debate, interesting in that we have covered it
>backwards and forwards in my seminars as a history grad student.
>
>historians love to claim the objective "how it was" and deny that they
>have an agenda of any sort.  but to be truthful and honest this is not
>possible.

To this we should add the words of a contemporary of Mark Twain's, Ambrose
Bierce.
>From "The Devil's Dictionary":

HISTORY, n.  An account mostly false, of events mostly unimportant,
which are brought about by rulers mostly knaves, and soldiers mostly
fools.

    Of Roman history, great Niebuhr's shown
    'Tis nine-tenths lying.  Faith, I wish 'twere known,
    Ere we accept great Niebuhr as a guide,
    Wherein he blundered and how much he lied.

                                                           Salder Bupp
Marcus W. Koechig

ATOM RSS1 RSS2