TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robert Hirst <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:16:14 -0800
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Yes, the only thing that's missing from the Times story is a simple
statement of where they got the text in the first place. Oh well, what can
you expect from a newspaper that also favored the Whitewater investigation?

Bob Hirst

At 09:11 AM 12/20/98, you wrote:
>Upon further checking in _Letters, Vol. 3_ -- the full text of
>"The White House Funeral" is reprinted pp. 458-466.  The notes
>also include a theory as to why it was pulled from the Tribune.
>
>Barb

ATOM RSS1 RSS2