TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Harold Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:35:17 -0600
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Hi Sharon:  that's a fascinating topic.  I looked for the study and I'm
assuming you mean this one:

The Irony of Satire:  Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You
Want to See in The Colbert Reportby LaMarre et al.  Yes?

You also allude to other "Recent studies" -- can you mention a few of the
ones you find most intriguing?

thanks, --Hal B.





*************************
> Modern Language Association Annual Convention 2012
> Seattle, 5-9 January 2012
>
> Satire's Double-Edged Irony
>
> The American Humor Studies Association is seeking papers that explore the
> often
> ambiguous nature of satire's object, the lines that blur between satire and
> celebration, and the difficulty of predicting or controlling audience
> response.
>
> Recent studies, such as "The Irony of Satire," suggest that the perception
> of
> satire's object often rests in the reader's or viewer's own biases.  This
> panel
> is interested in exploring the implications of this ambiguity in the
> production,
> deployment, and teaching of satire.  How does this affect satire's
> admittedly
> subversive purpose?  Is this satire's power, its limitation, or both?
>
> 250-word abstracts by 15 March 2011.
> Sharon McCoy
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Harold K. Bush, Ph.D
Professor of English
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO  63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2