TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Sep 1996 22:11:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
The comments about Austen remind me about my first attempt at a Ph.D at a
university which shall remain anonymous.  I wanted to specialize in early
American and write about Twain for my dissertation, but I wanted to minor
in 18th century British as well because I was interested in the history of
satire.  I approached one of the resident 18th-century British scholars--a
man who is (or, perhaps, was) a recognized authority on Austen--to be on my
committee.  He refused to serve because of Twain's comments about his
beloved Austen.  At the time, all I'd read of Austen was _Pride &
Prejudice_, and I haven't felt compelled to read anything else by her
through the ensuing years.

Jim McWilliams

ATOM RSS1 RSS2