TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 09:58:49 -0500
Reply-To: Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From: Everett Emerson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (9 lines)
I agree with David Barber's comments.  I reviewed Arac's book, favorably,
for the journal American Literature.  It's a very sophisticated and
persuasive book.  I've since reviewed Chadwick-Joshua's book, also for
American Literature.  I found her book very well meaning and at times
helpful: her comments on Huck and Jim's arguments, for example, are valid
and useful.  But her book is simply not in the same arena as Arac's book.

Everett Emerson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2