TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ballard, Terry Prof." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Apr 1999 10:14:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
   Here is a line of text, copied and pasted from the Times Article:

" Paul O'Neill, the New York Yankees right fielder, is a direct
descendant of Twain,"

It is also interesting that the other article mentioned that O'Neill's
sister is a feature writer for the Times. Since they are my local paper,
I took the liberty of making an inquiry with them.


                                                Terry Ballard


 ----------
From: Hal Bush
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Question for Yankee fans
Date: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 10:14AM

>There are no direct descendants of Samuel Clemens.  Most of us are
>descendants of his brother.
>Ellen Clemens Smart


I guess it all boils down to the term used in the original post, "direct
descendant":  is that the exact wording of O'Neill's claim?

If so, there appear to be 2 possibilities:

1.  Lawrence Howe's idea:  there may be "some evidence of an
illegitimate
branch of SLC's family tree that leads to O'Neill; those dalliances with
saloon girls might have generated an heir."  If this is to be taken
seriously, I am a bit surprised that no one has (so far) taken much
issue
with it.  Does anyone know of any evidence, hearsay or even the glimmer
of
such, that Twain did have an illegitimate child at some point?

2.  O'Neill is quite mistaken.

If that is NOT the the exact wording, there are also only 2
possibilities:

1.  Andy Hoffman's suggestion, which was my original reaction as well --
O'Neill has some connection as a distant relative, not direct
descendent.
This is very plausible -- and I would also like to know the exact
connection.

2.  O'Neill is quite mistaken.

 --Hal Bush

ATOM RSS1 RSS2