TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David H Fears <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:03:20 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In a message dated 9/14/2006 1:41:33 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

>It  appears that an argument
>could be made that Twain was aware of  the derogatory nature of the
>term and was using it to create  characters of low education or social
>standing.

>John  Evans

That's the infernal trouble with arguments--they're  like beds which can be
made or unmade any number of ways and are just as useful  for a good snore
session. Your point here is taken, save for that little detail that Huck is
the
great moral compass of the book--going against all societal norms for what
is
in the heart (note: not conscience, which Sam believed was little more than
the voices of authority).

DHF

ATOM RSS1 RSS2