TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter Salwen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 13:10:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
At 11:42 PM 9/10/96 UT, John Bird wrote:

"Jim is never ever named "Nigger Jim" in the novel.  That's a name
readers gave him.  (Like Hemingway in his famous comment.)"

John,

Right you are.

I thought about pointing that out in my original mailing, but I decided it
would be intrusive to editorialize at that point.

But it *is* an important point, as you say, and I suspect that the habit of
using that phrase tends to reduce Jim from a three-dimensional *character*
to a two-dimensional symbol.

The frequent use of the phrase "Nigger Jim" in discussions of "Huckleberry
Finn" -- as though the character goes through the book wearing that label --
may also help explain some of the widespread hostility to the book among
black Americans.
Best regards,

Pete Salwen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2