----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- The writer of the Canberra Times article appears to be motivated _primarily_ by an urge to challenge the idea that Marx was the greatest economist of the millenium. He "doth protest too much": > and for that reason Karl Marx (who is definitely not the runner up) I suspect Marx would agree, but for a different reason: what a silly, meaningless notion, "economist of the millennium", indeed! Tom Walker http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/worksite.htm ------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]