----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- Bliss has certainly been cited in the debates! Also, there are a number of recent contributions (by, e.g., Garegnani and Schefold) that show that the strategy by the neoclassical camp to by-pass the capital critiques by moving to intertemporal GE theory is not successful. The inquirer might look at Nell's The General Theory of Transformational Growth, subtitled Keynes After Sraffa, for a recent reflection from the critics camp. Also, some recent work from McCombie on aggregate production functions, and though I haven't looked at it, _Capital in economic theory: neo-classical, Cambridge, and chaos_ by Syed Ahmad, Elgar, 1991, is supposed to be a 'balanced' treatment. Mat Forstater ------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]