----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- Dear List Members, I am collecting examples of the Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy in economic analysis. Here under are the references known to me, I shall be appreciated to learn more related literature. (1) Hammond, Daniel (1996): Theory and Measurement: Causality Issues in Milton Friedman's Monetary Economics, Cambridge University Press. (2) Hoover, Kevin and Stephen Perez (1994): Post hoc ergo propter hoc once more: an evaluation of Does monetary policy matter? in the spirit of James Tobin, Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(1):47-73. (3) Hoover, Kevin and Stephen Perez (1994): Money may matter, but how could you know? Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(1):89-99. (4) Tobin, James (1970a): Money and income: Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2):301-17. (5) Friedman, Milton (1970): Money and income: Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Comment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2):318-27. (6) Tobin, James (1970b): Money and income: Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Rejoinder, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2):328-9. (7) Romer, Christina and David Romer (1994): Monetary policy matters, Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(1):75-88. Cheng-chung Lai National Tsing Hua University Taiwan ------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]