Hmmm...so we're supposed to praise a documentary, even if it is greatly flawed; accept a biography, even if it is an inaccurate and sensationalist distortion; and praise an awards show, even if it has nothing whatsoever to do with the person whose name it co-opts? Just because Mark Twain appeals to the masses, those of us who really know something about him are supposed to check our opinions (and perhaps our brains) at the door? I'm not a wine connoisseur, but I know the difference between a good Merlot and a bottle of Ripple. And if I reasonably articulate the differences, I don't think I am "bad-mouthing." We owe nothing less to the legacy of Mark Twain than to make rational discriminations.