American National Biography Online Fourier, Charles (7 Apr. 1772-10 Oct. 1837), utopian social theorist, was born Charles Fourrier in Besancon, Franche-Comte, France, the son of Charles Fourrier, a wealthy cloth merchant, and Marie Muguet. He received a solid classical but otherwise indifferent education at the Jesuit College de Besancon (1781-1787) and therefore was essentially an autodidact. It was expected that as the sole surviving son he would succeed his father as head of the family firm, and he began his apprenticeship in the cloth trade at age six. In temperament and sensibilities, however, he was unsuited to commercial life; he found its necessary chicanery morally repugnant. Nevertheless, with the death of his father (1781), and in accordance with the terms of his will, Charles was compelled to enter a commercial career by age twenty or forfeit a substantial patrimony of 42,932 livres. Since his writings remained largely unremarked until 1832, and generated, in any case, no reliable source of revenue, Fourier ironically relied on what he called "the jailhouse of commerce" for support throughout his life. He was by turns a mercantile clerk, a traveling salesman, and a courtier marron (unlicensed broker). Fourier's life was played out on a grand historical stage. The events of the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Empire, the Bourbon Restoration, and the revolution of 1830 affected his personal life and fortunes, but seem to have little direct impact on the convoluted exposition of his ideas that found expression in his writings. He lost heavily in an ill-fated venture as a purveyor of colonial goods to Lyon, and he barely escaped execution by Jacobin forces when they purged that royalist stronghold in 1793. He was caught up in the levee en masse of the republic and served in the Army of the Rhine (1794-1796). By 1799, through a series of inauspicious investments, virtually all of his inheritance had been dissipated. By 1799 as well, out of the chaos of revolutionary politics and the disappointments of his personal experience, Fourier had emerged with the fundamental insight that would provide the foundation for all of his later work--"the calculus of the mechanism of the passions." The calculus was an interactive system of three "distributive passions"--the cabalist or intriguing passion, the butterfly or alternating passion, and the composite or enthusiastic passion--that insured the gratification and equilibration of all other human passions, and made possible the formation of the "passionate series," which constituted the theoretical foundation of Fourier's utopian association, the phalanx. Fourier had glimpsed a vision of a perfectly calibrated, harmonious world, one of "natural or attractive association." In this imagined world, the free pursuit of individual happiness and instinctual gratification would automatically subserve the commonweal. The conflict between work and desire would disappear through the social device of natural association within the "passionate" or "progressive series"--groups comprised of people with shared interests and personal characteristics that would provide both order and freedom through a perfectly balanced contrast of sex, age, wealth, temperaments, tastes, talents, and education. Fourier spent the rest of his life extending his critique of contemporary civilization, devising schematic outlines and systematic compendia of his ideas in order to reach a wider audience, and seeking a wealthy patron who would make it possible to establish a working model of his idealized community. During much of his lifetime, Fourier's works were largely ignored or, occasionally, noticed with scorn and incredulity. As he himself was acutely aware, his lack of fortune and formal education meant that he was disparaged as a provincial philosophe manque. Throughout his life he resented his treatment at the hands of the Parisian literati, who persistently ignored what they disdainfully termed his "inventive genius" and who saw in him only a "near illiterate" and a "scientific pariah." Contemporaries were troubled as much, however, by style and content as by Fourier's status. They found his work obscure (riddled with neologisms), unintelligible, and extravagantly fantastic--in his new order human beings would evolve to an improved physical state, attaining a height of seven feet, developing an archibras (a powerful tail tipped with a claw-like hand), and living for 144 years. His ideas of social change, especially his celebration of the instincts over reason, sexual liberation (he sought the emancipation of sexual expression--explicitly championing homosexuals, lesbians, sadomasochists, and fetishists--and the full integration of sexuality into collective life), and the emancipation of women (he argued that social progress could only occur in the context of an equitable treatment of the female population), scandalized many of his contemporaries. It was not until the 1820s that Fourier had any substantial following, and then only among the provincial bourgeoisie. A schism among the followers of utopian socialist Henri Saint-Simon in the early 1830s drew adherents to Fourier and led to the establishment of the Fourierist movement in France. A journal, the Phalanstere (1832-1834), was established, and a model Fourierist community (a phalanx)--the Societary Colony--was established in Conde-sur-Vesgre (1833-1836). Fourier also had a following in Romania and, through the popularization of his ideas by Albert Brisbane (1809-1890), the social reformer, Fourierist disciple, and editor of the Phalanx (1843-1845), enjoyed the greatest practical trial of the phalanstery system in the United States, where some forty-odd phalanxes were established between 1843 and 1858. The popularity of Fourierism in the United States was due chiefly to Brisbane's conversion of Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune, to the cause. Greeley placed a regular column (entitled "Association") in his paper at the disposal of Brisbane for the promotion of Fourierism. The Tribune promoted the organization of associationists (as early American Fourierists were called) through editorials, announcements of meetings, and advertisements for publications. The Fourierist movement grew rapidly in the United States through the organization of conventions of associationists. The growth of the movement was enhanced by its early advocacy of the abolition of slavery--both wage and chattel. But perhaps the greatest attractions of Fourierism were its seeming simplicity (as presented by Brisbane), its secular organization, and its relative moderation--avoiding the kind of socioeconomic organization that led contemporary historians of the utopian movement in the United States to describe these settlements as "communistic societies." American phalanxes had an average lifespan of about two years; only two--the North American Phalanx (Red Bank, N.J., 1843-1855), and the Wisconsin Phalanx (Fond du Lac County, 1844-1850)--lasted more than five years. The most important Fourierist journal in the country was the Harbinger, published by Brook Farm, which functioned as a Fourierist community between 1844 and 1847. Like the overwhelming majority of the utopian communities founded in the United States in the nineteenth century, most phalanxes had collapsed by 1855. Some selectivity was exercised in admitting members, since most American phalanxes required a probationary period of one year prior to acceptance to full membership. Life in most phalanxes centered around agricultural production, though all attempted to foster education and to cultivate the mind as well. Work was allotted according to preference, and wages were determined by a scale that awarded the highest pay for the most repulsive or exhausting jobs. Though Fourierist communities are often categorized as utopian socialist experiments, they were really individualist, joint-stock ventures, often closer to anarchistic than communistic in operation. The egoistic dissentions and disgruntlement that surrounded the dissolution of Brook Farm were illustrative of the unrestrained individualism that overwhelmed the communal ideals of the Fourierist experiment in America. As a social thinker, Fourier was a transitional figure, reacting to the ultrarationality of the Enlightenment and presaging the elevation of the instinctual in the Romantic age. He saw himself as the Newton of social law and the human passions, arguing that "the law of series is the unique rule of universal movement, the key to all the sciences because it balances the physical forces and the passionate energy of the soul" (Theorie des quatre mouvements et des destinees generales [1808]). In essence, this "law" required the division of the labor force into organized task groups or series--an office work series, for example--based on the "passional attractions" or instinctual preferences of the labor force for one or another task. Many modern communal societies employ this "law," which today might be better understood as a psychological insight, as the basis for their organization of collective work. Aspirations to a universal system aside, however, Fourier can perhaps best be understood as a satiric moralist in the tradition of Jean de La Fontaine, Bernard de Mandeville, Jonathan Swift, Voltaire, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and the marquis de Sade. His acute critique of contemporary society and his vision of a better world, like theirs, often grew out of a mordant sensibility to the foibles and vices of civilization. He divided human history into three stages, which he called savagery, barbarism, and civilization. The latter did not compare well with the earlier stages, being characterized by war, plunder, rapine, and duplicity. The world's sickness, he maintained, was graphically represented by 130 species of poisonous snakes, an "exact replica" of the "130 effects of calumny and perfidy" that comprised these "deceitful societies" (Le Nouveau monde industriel et societaire). While Fourierism remains largely a historical curiosity, Fourier's attempt to legitimate desire and to reconcile the social order and instinctual life remains a fundamental preoccupation of social theorists. Fourier's monomaniacal absorption in his own theories, his paranoia about the threat of the theft of his social "invention," the opaqueness and hermetic nature of his prose, his bitter animosities arising out of his frustrations in life, and the personal jealousies and idiosyncrasies that even at the height of his popularity in France estranged him from his own disciples, certainly contributed to his relative obscurity among major social thinkers. Not surprisingly, Fourier died alone, apparently at his own desire, in a rented room in Paris. He was buried in Montmartre cemetery. Bibliography Fourier's papers, comprising ninety-eight cahiers and correspondence, are in the Archives de l'Ecole Societaire (Archives Nationales) in Paris. A collection of periodical and pamphlet literature by Fourier and about Fourierism may be found in the Fonds Fourieristes, Institut Francaise d'Histoire Sociale, Paris. Fourier's most important works include Traite de l'association domestique-agricole (2 vols., 1822), La Fausse industrie morcellee, repugnante, mensongere, et l'antidote, l'industrie naturelle, combinee, attrayante, veridique, donnant quadruple produit (2 vols., 1835-1836), Le Nouveau monde amoureux (1967), and L'Ordre subversif: Trois textes sur la Civilization (1972). Though the bulk of his work has not been translated, a rudimentary grounding in his thought for English readers may be derived from Albert Brisbane, Social Destiny of Man; or, Association and Reorganization of Industry (1840); Charles Fourier, The Passions of the Human Soul and Their Influence on Society and Civilization, trans. John Reynell (2 vols., 1851); and Jonathan Beecher, The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier: Selected Texts on Work, Love, and Passionate Attraction (1971), the most extensive modern anthology. Charles Pellarin, Charles Fourier, sa vie et sa theorie, 2d ed. (1843), is an essential biographical source. Roland Barthes, Sade, Fourier, Loyola (1971), has a penetrating and insightful section on Fourier. The definitive modern biographical source, also offering acute critical insight, is Jonathan Beecher, Charles Fourier, the Visionary and His World (1986). The most comprehensive treatment of Fourierism in the United States is Carl Guarneri, The Utopian Alternative: Fourierism in Nineteenth-Century America (1991). Louis J. Kern Back to the top Citation: Louis J. Kern. "Fourier, Charles"; http://www.anb.org/articles/15/15-01109.html; American National Biography Online Feb. 2000. Access Date: Copyright (c) 2000 American Council of Learned Societies. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Note: This email has been sent in plain text format so that it may be read with the standard ASCII character set. Special characters and formatting have been normalized. Copyright Notice Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of the American National Biography of the Day and Sample Biographies provided that the following statement is preserved on all copies: From American National Biography, published by Oxford University Press, Inc., copyright 2000 American Council of Learned Societies. Further information is available at http://www.anb.org. American National Biography articles may not be published commercially (in print or electronic form), edited, reproduced or otherwise altered without the written permission of Oxford University Press which acts as an agent in these matters for the copyright holder, the American Council of Learned Societies. Contact: Permissions Department, Oxford University Press, 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016; fax: 212-726-6444.