[I think it's time to start a new thread since this isn't about anniversaries any more. (And I am sorry for the typo I didn't catch in all of those subject lines.) This conversation came from http://eh.net/pipermail/hes/2006-January/003466.html HB] E. Roy Weintraub said: >A critique of a body [sic -- whose?] of economic analysis may be called >"feminist" if that critique is developed from an analysis of the gendered >assumptions that underlie the distinctions and presuppostions of those texts. What's a "gendered assumption"? Words have genders in some languages, but I take it that you are not referring to that aspect of language. Samuel Bostaph