James Ahiakpor takes Roy Davidson to task for a supposedly superficial reading of James's posts. But James himself admits to not having known of Henry George's substantial _The Science of Political Economy_ (first ed., 1897). His superficial acquaintance with George hasn't held him back from proclaiming, in an earlier post, his confidence that he could do with him what he has already so notably done for the world with that other confused soul, John Maynard Keynes: debunk him. But he has asked me for evidence that "there is much demand for such an effort to take up documenting the sources of George's errors". There is a voluminous literature on George. I'll mention two: 1. Robert V Andelson (ed.), _Critics of Henry George: A Centenary Appraisal of their Strictures on "Progress and Poverty"_. (Cranbury, NJ: Associated University presses, 1979). It has 27 chapters on such critics as Marshall, Francis Walker, J B Clark, Seligman, Carver, Ely, and Rothbart. Pat Gunning would particularly enjoy the paper by Aaron Fuller on Herbert Davenport: "Single Taxer of the Looser Observance", which nicely brings out the need to distinguish between what is true of the individual entrepreneur (rent is a cost) and the society (rent is not a cost). 2. Kenneth C Wenzer (ed.), _Land-Value Taxation: The Equitable and Efficient Source of Public Finance_ (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1999). This includes four chapters on George's modern relevance by Nobel Laureate William Vickrey. Our friend Mason Gaffney also has a chapter on "Tax Reform to Release Land". Roger Sandilands