Steven Kates writes: > >I don't have a paper but there is an extremely interesting discussion >in Hayek's _The Fatal Conceit_ (Routledge 1988, pp 57-58) in which >Keynes's statement is shown to be not only economically destructive as a >basis for policy but is also deeply amoral, being "a characteristic >manifestation of an unwillingness to recognise that morals are concerned >with effects in the long run." I consider the use of the word "shown" inappropriate, as it has the pretension of relating to objective truth; "argued", "suggested", "intimated" or "maintained" would have reflected the implicit subjectivity of of the assessment. Jesse Vorst