[A combintation of a list software upgrade and lack of easy web access at the ASSA meetings caused the delay in distributing messages to this list. Sorry about that. HB] James C.W. Ahiakpor, Well, I know I promised not to say anything further, but you managed to be sufficiently personally insulting as well as just plain wrong, that I am breaking my promise (which I now reissue, about to go out the door to the meetings in Chicago where I hope to see some of you). a) I have read Keynes's 1923 tract. b) I read your 1990 paper when it first came out and am no more impressed with its arguments today than I was then, although you keep repeating them here. Basically Darity and Young pretty much took you apart. Your argument depends on a peculiar interpretation of "the classical model," ignoring contradictions within that model and also ignoring Keynes's own critiques of it. Also, citing works by Steven Kates, who likes to dredge up questionable quotes about Keynes supposedly by Hayek for this list, is not exactly impressive either. As regards capital, I shall simply quote something I doubt that you have read: "What really is capital and what does it mean for value, growth, and distribution? Is it a pile of produced means of production? It is it dated labor? Is it waiting? Is it roundaboutness? Is it an accumulated pile of finance? Is it a social relation? Is it an independent source of value? The answers to these questions are probably matters of belief." Barkley Rosser