John Medaille's characterization of Moore's ethical position may fit textbook descriptions in some limited sense, but it is badly mistaken. When Moore says that the good is indefinable, he is arguing that it is a Platonic essence that would be intuited identically by any reasonable person. Moore never argues in _Principia Ethica_ that the good is individually determined or different for each person. In fact, that is exactly the opposite of what he argues. (I am not defending Moore's position here, nor am in interested in talking about some of its obvious limits.) Thus, I join Steve Horwitz in calling for the end to the use of easy labels. If John Medaille thinks that Moore states anywhere in _Principia Ethica_ or _Ethics_ that the good is individually determined and specific to each person, then let him give us a citation. Bradley W. Bateman